The tusks in the burn area were not newly planted corn, they were dried out remnants from the previous year's growing season. In Ayr where the farm is located, corn wouldn't normally be planted until late May or even later. I think they are very *lucky* that the whole field didn't start blazing. I don't have the weather stats for that time period to know how wet or dry it had been, but looks like corn field remnant fires are not all that uncommon. And to think they were using an accelerant, .. it just boggles my mind. Imagine if the fire had spread like wildfire, as it has sometimes been known to *do* in a cornfield, even *without* accelerant. Emergency vehicles show up, and what do we have here? Jeez, what a risk they took.. another act of complete stupidity, imho.
I am still surprised that neighbours wouldn't have called the FD if an accelerated blaze was seen in the middle of the night at an unattended farmland with outbuildings in their neighbourhood.. if for no other reason than to ensure the fire would not spread to others, where perhaps there *are* live animals, people, crops and homes. When someone sees a big blaze out of their window at a vacant farmland in the middle of the night, wouldn't they call the FD, rather than second guess themselves as to whether it *may* not be an emergency? Who would take the chance? Better to be safe than sorry? If the bonfire took place in the daytime, that could explain it? Or it nobody happened to notice, although I would imagine the smell would have made neighbouring properties take notice, imho.
Here are a couple of articles from not that far away, regarding off-season cornfield fires, just for information. One in late October in Brant County, and one in early May in Woodstock.
http://www.1047.ca/news/local-news/fire-crews-battle-cornfield-fire-just-outside-of-woodstock/
http://www.brantnews.com/news-story/6046082-cornfield-catches-fire/