SnooperDuper
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
- Messages
- 7,676
- Reaction score
- 2,837
I had the vague sense from the date on the article that he presented himself willingly to LE and then proceeded to tell the lies he and MH had agreed upon. Give the *****storm on his FB account and the saturation of media coverage he probably knew he was going to be approached by LE anyway. I don't think his approaching LE either credits or discredits him, I think it was just inevitable.
Well MH cagily said "lies have been told" and RP shushed him. It was TD that dragged out the fact that MH himself told over 40 lies and sent LE on a "wild goose chase" according to AP.
I think the teller of the lies was MH, and with AM immediately willing to cooperate with LE, their friendship broke down.
AM was friends with DM on Facebook until DM's account was pulled just before the trial. That was an action on DM's end. AM never once shied away from his connections to the case: he is still friends with MM and LB too. In a way he's provided a bit of a public reference. Maybe his position from the start was always, I am going to stand and be accountable?
Anyone's guess until testimony starts anyway. Looking forward to that....sometime...