Madeleine74
Knower of Things
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2011
- Messages
- 11,556
- Reaction score
- 20,081
Ah but it means everything, to the court, to the appeals court, to the Supreme Court. It's the bread & butter for lawyers like Zellner. No one has to like it or agree with it, but those are the rules and laws they live with. Zellner knows this completely.
You don't get to stand in a courtroom and stomp your foot and say "but that's not faiiiirrrrrrr." It's an adversarial system and both sides play their part. The state has burden, per the US Constitution. However, once convicted the burden shifts. The CoA upheld SA's conviction. Now it comes down to proving innocence, not just reasonable doubt. These are seriously high stakes for any convicted person.
Feelings have nothing to do with this; this is down to (in essence) "put up or shut up" time for the court. This is the most important aspect of this or any case especially at this point. Dredging up aspects of the investigation that are not part of the court record and will not be part of Zellner's case for innocence might be amusing for case followers, but that's all it is.
Zellner is not going to throw everything against the wall, like spaghetti. She'd be escorted out of court if she attempted that. Her argument will be focused.
You don't get to stand in a courtroom and stomp your foot and say "but that's not faiiiirrrrrrr." It's an adversarial system and both sides play their part. The state has burden, per the US Constitution. However, once convicted the burden shifts. The CoA upheld SA's conviction. Now it comes down to proving innocence, not just reasonable doubt. These are seriously high stakes for any convicted person.
Feelings have nothing to do with this; this is down to (in essence) "put up or shut up" time for the court. This is the most important aspect of this or any case especially at this point. Dredging up aspects of the investigation that are not part of the court record and will not be part of Zellner's case for innocence might be amusing for case followers, but that's all it is.
Zellner is not going to throw everything against the wall, like spaghetti. She'd be escorted out of court if she attempted that. Her argument will be focused.