IMHO, I think you are missing the point...Jaddie's post mentioned that she was upset about WHO handled the bones...not that they were boxed up. IMO, Jaddie's post questioned whether the people handling the bones where "qualified" to handle those bones or if there was a more appropriate agency that should have done that.
bbm
Apparently, those who handles the bones were about as "qualified" as they are "Honest"... Here is how Steve Moore, (FBI), puts it... complete with a pic of they way it should have been handled, (just like Missy said), exactly as found before moving anything at all:
![Grid.jpg Grid.jpg](https://www.websleuths.com/forums/data/attachments/79/79804-c851f94de92c22e6bc1681becf1b0d42.jpg)
OFF THE GRID
Another head-shaking moment for me was that the Avery burn-pit itself was not 'gridded.'
Gridding is essentially a survey taken of the actual crime evidence location. Everything is photographed and mapped, identifying the location of every single item in that area in relation to every single other item. For instance, if leg bone fragments were found inside skull bones, it would be prima facie evidence that the bones had been moved somehow post-burning, or that the bones were simply dropped at the site in a pile. Gridding of a site where a body was burned should show (within certain parameters) bones in normal relationship to each other, with deviations for the affects of heat.
Gridding could have been powerful evidence and likely proven whether the Avery burn pit was the primary burn site or not. However, because Manitowoc and Calumet SO's did such a poor job of managing the scene, this crucial evidence was lost. The frustration of Wisconsin State Crime Lab forensic scientist John Ertl was palpable as he testified to the lack of proper procedure used by the deputies. Due to the destruction of the crime scene, the ability of the state lab to assist was drastically reduced.
One thing we know for sure: The bones of Teresa Halbach were moved. That is not in dispute. For Avery to have burned Teresa's body the night of the bonfire, he would have had to do so knowing that people might have shown up. The body would have to have been consumed dramatically quickly. The other possibility is that Avery burned the body at the quarry, then returned the remaining bones to his burn pit, which makes no sense at all.
I think that the evidence points strongly to the scenario of Teresa's body being burned at the quarry, then the remains transferred to Avery's pit in BB2. Additionally, Avery had an incinerator which would have made quick work of the body, negating his need to burn it in the open.
More evidence that Teresa's body was likely not burned behind Stephen Avery's house is the strong evidence that she was transported from the murder scene, wherever that was, in her own vehicle. It seems obvious at this point that she was not killed at the Avery trailer or garage. Why then, would Avery bring her back to his house to burn her body? Then, take only a few of the bones and put them in the quarry burn site. It makes no sense.
If the prosecutor believes that Stephen Avery killed Teresa Halbach in his trailer or his garage, and then piled her body in to the RAV4 to drive her 20 feet to the bonfire, Mr. Kratz has been over-medicating himself.
http://www.gmancasefile.com/moore-to-the-story.html