JerseyGirl33
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2016
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 0
How can it be possible to get 6 months jail time (not prison...jail) and out in 3 for good behavior?! Talk about a slap on the wrist. This disgusts me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok. My dear WS Friends.
I have not read the entire thread but just watched the evening news. I am completely OUTRAGED.
I am the mother of two sons. One who is a senior at University and the other going this Fall.
There is no way in HE** my sons would behave like this young man. I would bet my life on it.
What a creep. The comment "20 min of action" really offended me.
OK. Back to reading. Thanks for letting me rant!
Sent from my XT1031 using Tapatalk
It also has a statement from a family friend, who happens to be a retired federal prosecutor (that's gotta have some weight...), that was also submitted to the judge;
"A retired federal prosecutor and friend of the Turner family, Margaret M. Quinn, asked the judge to consider the long-term damage inflicted by Turners conviction: limited job opportunities and the requirement to register as a sex offender.
As I know you are aware, the collateral consequences of a conviction are staggering, Quinn wrote, saying they go beyond his expulsion from Stanford.
She asked the judge to consider allowing Turner to counsel young men and warning them about the devastating consequences of a single decision. She suggested Turner could serve as a mentor."
Please keep him away from counseling other young men!!
Good Morning Everyone
Apparently, Mr. Stand Out Athlete was not so squeaky clean after all.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/do...inking-doing-drugs/ar-AAgOpS9?ocid=spartandhp
1. Makes me wonder if he slipped something into the victim's drink, although I suppose that would show up on the tests at the hospital.Good Morning Everyone
Apparently, Mr. Stand Out Athlete was not so squeaky clean after all.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/do...inking-doing-drugs/ar-AAgOpS9?ocid=spartandhp[/QUOTE
Here's another article showing BT with a bong, hash pipe etc......
"Stanford rapist pictured with a bong: Photos of Brock Tuner 'smoking' prove he lied to judge about illicit drug use while text messages show references to taking LSD and ecstasy"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...t-messages-references-taking-LSD-ecstasy.html
He's appealing his sentence. It seems like by the time his case is heard on appeal his 6 month (three month) sentence will be served. It is my opinion that he is not appealing the jail time, but he is really appealing to get the registered sex offender status off his record.
I am really glad that this case is receiving the attention it is. I don't know that anything can be done to change his jail time, but I am hopeful that with this case getting the attention it is the registered sex offender status will not be taken off his record.
It's too bad that prosecutors can't appeal a sentence, like South African prosecutors were able to with Oscar Pistorius (sp?)
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
http://abc11.com/news/stanford-swim...ior-prior-to-sex-assault-prosecutors/1377526/
So it wasn't just 20 minutes of bad behavior. Imagine that.
Yes, that is correct, the judge had this information. 😠The article repeatedly refers to this information as being in the sentencing documents.
I assume that means that the judge had that information available to him before sentencing the rapist Brock Turner (formerly known as the swimmer Brock Turner) to just six months?