I sure hope he doesn't! I hope he stays strong till BR gets his jury trial. Here is something I wonder too. If this suit comes out in favor of Dr. Spitz, what will happen to all the previous law suits?
I know some people don't like Dr. Spitz because he has never wavered in his belief but... most doctors once they reach their conclusion, should stay firm if their evidence backs up their belief. I wouldnt want a forensic pathologist in my family's murder to be wishy washy. If he felt there was strong evidence towards a answer then I would want to believe him. Unlike the ME that did JonBenets autopsy, Dr. Spitz has decades of homicide cases behind him.
Since the family didn't let him in to look inside the home, he was left with the only other option and had to use crime scene photos. So if the crime scene investigators did a decent job, and the Ramsey's didn't remove the item, he came to his only logical conclusion with the facts and evidence given to him. Even if the ME wasn't versed in many homicides, if he followed proper procedure during the autopsy and did comment on all of the injuries properly, then any forensic pathologist following him should be able to reach conclusions based off his/her findings. If he couldn't view the scene, and he came to a conclusion due to that, then that also falls on the Ramsey's. I mean if they had nothing to hide, why not let him in and allow him to out together a theory? If they truly wanted her case solved, they would have welcomed his input. But they didn't. No one was living in the house anymore. What would it have hurt? I agree with Dr. Spitz...what were they hiding? JMOO. If it was my daughter and we were innocent, I'd be begging anyone with that much experience to help me.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk