My observations on An Update on Our Father recently posted by one of the daughters on another forum. Note that this is my personal opinion and I am not asking anyone to agree with me.
Daughter posted Bob never kept his wallet and keys in his pocket unless he was out somewhere. She posted they noticed in a fairly recent photograph that Bob was wearing another pair of glasses that were not found. My interpretation (IMO): She wants the reader to believe that Bob left the house voluntarily and that whatever happened to him did not occur in the house (e.g. a possible confrontation with the SIL, and his wallet, keys, and glasses were then removed from the house with him).
She posted that Bob cannot get into his own home now if he tried with his own set of keys. My interpretation (IMO): Shes not worried that Bob cant get into the house - shes still furious that she cannot get into the house. I guess she forgot that her older sister posted on Aug 11, 2009 that the changing of the locks was her suggestion.
She posted she recently spoke to the lead detective. She posted detective said its still an active investigation and nobody has been cleared. She asked him about homeless shelters and he said they checked junkyard/fruit stand property nearby, local landfill, and one homeless shelter in the area.
She posted she already knew they have a lot of different phone records from several states to review. My interpretation (IMO): She wants the reader to believe that Fontelles children are being looked at by the PPD.
She posted the cold feet theory came directly from the PPD. She posted that each of them considered their theory but promptly rejected it as none of the family members ever believed that their father would walk away. My interpretation (IMO): Shes trying to blame the PPD for the cold feet suggestion. Not sure how she defines promptly but I counted 10 comments from her and her older sister posted on IS between 8/14/2009 and 8/21/2009 that in my opinion, implied Bob walked away.
She posted that Paul was the Bobs closest friend since her parents moved to Placentia, and that perhaps Paul can contribute some tidbit that might stimulate investigators about something they missed before. She posted that she emailed Pauls contact info to the lead investigator about a week ago. My interpretation (IMO): She is downplaying the importance of a witness (Bobs best friend). She emailed Pauls contact information to the PPD (~July 28th or 29th) only after she called and spoke to him on July 27th.
I notice she didnt post anything about planned vigils, searches, posting of fliers, establishing a reward, creating a website, asking posters to link Bobs missing flier, etc. Yet there were >20 filings by her and her older sister on the Conservatorship of Estate probate case between 8/7/2009 and 6/7/2010 (that doesnt include the Trust Proceedings case).
