Herding Cats
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
- Messages
- 7,966
- Reaction score
- 50
Anyone who can compartmentalize like he did has an interesting mind, to me. To have such a clear focus - so much so that he let others he ran into/carjacked/held hostage live even though their escape meant that he'd be in a firefight - that speaks reams towards focus.Okay. PEACE! Human nature is intriguing. I take an interest in the smart predators. Dorner wasn't that smart, his kill rate is rather low all things considered. Dorner was conflicted, and sad, and kind of pleasing/pathetic.
If the targets are in L.A. you hunt in L.A. preferably before they realize they are being hunted, scampering off to Big Bear with snow and icey roads to take over cabins and freeze your a___ off while taking a few hostages isn't exactly a great plan.
Why do you find the mindset fascinating? Serious question.
He was hunting his targets in Irvine...what a lot of folks don't understand is that there are LAPD officers in many communities OTHER than Los Angeles - Simi Valley, Santa Clarita, Irvine, OC, Ventura...lots of the LAPD officers live away from the city they protect. So for him to be killing in Irvine is not an unreasonable or "other place" to hunt. He did kill Quan and Lawrence, both connected to LE (one as the target, the other as her fiance = family). Quan was the one who Dorner believed didn't defend him well during the hearings. So Dorner's killing of his child is a pretty clear carry-out of his manifesto targets.
As for him hunting others, I'm fairly sure he did. He allegedly went to two other houses, but no one was home, and thus they were not shot.
I have NO idea why he went to Big Bear. I had originally thought that it was to spread out manpower so he could continue attacks...and that still may be why he did. But he ended up trapped up there, and once he thought things were calming down (e.g. the CP was removed), he thought he'd make a run for it. He didn't make it...but I still don't know why he chose BB. Baffling, to me.
And may have been the mistake he made. Had he come down off the mountain, he'd've gotten lost in this huge city. Probably could have survived for a while, sniping with his Barrett 50 cal., but who knows.
And I don't suppose we'll ever know why he chose BB...
Agree with the police procedures/responses being changed and using this as a case study. Not so much with the rest of it. He's only one person, and I don't think anything can be extrapolated and applied to other people based on his actions, at least not anything on the level scholarly research. jmo
Well, the same sort of thing was said about Dahmer, and about Bundy, and about BTK, and on and on. Yet they've learned a whole lot about psychopathology from them, and have been able to revamp some of the "knowns" about how MI works (or maybe I should say 'affects').
I suspect there will be a ton learned from this; we may never know just how much is learned, or what changes get made in various places because of this evil SOB...but I have faith that a lot will be learned and a lot of things developed that are proactive in nature that will assist LE, and others, in the future.
Police departments sometimes use real life cases to develop training scenarios for their academies. Since this case involved multi-department cooperation over a large area, I could see them developing a program to train for this sort of event, should it occur in the future.
LE does use a lot of previously experienced situations that have gone wrong to learn from, and this was a huge joint effort - from Federal level down to beat cop in several jurisdictions. I bet this will be taught a whole lot...the rights and the wrongs in LE's response, and Dorner's actions (insofar as they can reconstruct them) will be analyzed out the wazoo to better prepare LE on all levels to respond effectively and with less loss of life next time.
Best-
Herding Cats