CARIIS
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2012
- Messages
- 25,470
- Reaction score
- 10,693
Hi KarA random shooting (if it was and we don't know that) would have been a much better and more accurate way to describe it. jmo
Nice to see you!!!
Hi KarA random shooting (if it was and we don't know that) would have been a much better and more accurate way to describe it. jmo
Spree killing or mass murder is at least 3 or 4 killed.
Great. So long as all the killing of 3 or more are called "spree" killings. They're not. There's a reason. jmo
I am going to be very careful wiht you then , I was on the other end !I am also very aware of what happens when LE shows up for a well-being check. I have also been on the receiving end of a take down. :blushing:
Sadly I agree with you - its lineof duty does not make it better but in terms of victimazation like stuff - there is an awareness when they leave in the AM--you know what I meanWay more than one and LE don't count unless it's random. jmo
The FBI defines mass murder at least 4 people killed.
Generally, mass murder was described as a number of murders (four or more) occurring during the same incident, with no distinctive time period between the murders. These events typically involved a single location, where the killer murdered a number of victims in an ongoing incident (e.g. the 1984 San Ysidro McDonalds incident in San Diego, California; the 1991 Lubys Restaurant massacre in Killeen, Texas; and the 2007 Virginia Tech murders in Blacksburg, Virginia).
http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/serial-murder/serial-murder-1#two
Yes. And more importantly, the police taken down in connection with taking the perpetrator into custody are not counted among the murders as the intent is, usually, completely different. By way of gruesome example, if someone kills a family, makes a welfare call and greets LE at the door with gun fire, that's completely different than what happened here. Still maybe not a spree, but closer than this. Not sure why the word "spree" is important to describe something that clearly is not. jmo
They don't count as killing "spree" victims since there's a reason apart from the initial crime that they're killed. I thought that was obvious.
I am going to be very careful wiht you then , I was on the other end !
The obsessively detailed self-published account of his life inevitably raises questions of how much was real and how much was hopelessly distorted by the filter of illness. Still, its writing is clear and precise. “It has none of the raving quality that you see in the writing of people with psychosis,” such as Jared L. Loughner, who opened fire on Representative Gabrielle Giffords in Arizona in 2011, said Dr. Michael Stone, a New York forensic psychiatrist who looked at the manuscript but has no connection to the family.
Personally, I think the term "spree" has been used (perhaps carelessly) by msm to depict a carefree and gleeful attitude on the killer's part. Not necessarily to be inferred exactly as it is defined, kwim? "Spree" sounds fun, shopping sprees and the like. Jmo.
I almost feel like doing a poll or something, but I'm trying to figure out how much ER wrote in his bio is TRUE, how much is TRUE-ISH (happened, but not exactly the way it seemed to him), and how much is a COMPLETE FABRICATION.
Two occurances really have me wondering....throwing a latte on 2 women at a bus stop, and spraying college men and women with a Super Soaker full of orange juice.
I can imagine the latte thing happening MAYBE, but for him to actually drive to the store, purchase a water gun, purchase orange juice, fill the gun, drive back to the park and spray a group of people that included men who could most likely beat his a$$....I am just not seeing it.
I am right there with you, but then I think about him pushing/trying to push people off a balcony/deck and I think, well maybe.