I am troubled by really how stupid Nicole would have to be to tell IM the things she is reported to have told her. For someone supposedly trying to cover involvement in a murder, it just becomes unbelievable that Nicole would say the things she did in front of another person not involved in the crime. So I went back and looked again at the Probable Cause document. Is it possible that Nicole is furious that her husband appears to be a liar, she herself isn't a liar and doesn't get tongue tied, she might be saying. Could it actually be that she only very strongly suspects her killed her and is very irritated that he's bumbling with stupid excuses when she herself has no trouble with a clear line of answers? And then the statement that no body no crime - that's what a lot of us say here and also the belief that the body won't be found.
So. Rereading this, is it possible that Nicole only very strongly suspects him and is not involved herself?
edited to add: I guess that doesn't take into account she was probably seen at the car at 10 a.m.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1225468-1765-001.html
So. Rereading this, is it possible that Nicole only very strongly suspects him and is not involved herself?
edited to add: I guess that doesn't take into account she was probably seen at the car at 10 a.m.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1225468-1765-001.html