Bernina
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages
- 11,444
- Reaction score
- 6,071
Yes when you line up all he said and did, there are plenty of indicators of guilt.
But some want to infer things like he has children or likes puppy dogs are indicators of innocence. Hell, even Hitler had a dog and a Jewish doctor.
This thread has gone long enough to confirm Godwin's law:
"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."
![]()
Godwin's law itself can be abused as a distraction, diversion or even as censorship, fallaciously miscasting an opponent's argument as hyperbole when the comparisons made by the argument are actually appropriate.
BBM
The comparison was by no means appropriate.
I disagree, The comparison was valid in the form it was used.