GUILTY CA - Lana Clarkson, 40, fatally shot, Alhambra, 3 Feb 2003

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Defense exhibit IIIII Who came up with this absurd system of identifying exhibits?

It was best when they got to KKK and *advertiser censored*.

Why don't they stick to numbers with either D or P in front of them?
 
Somebody slap me if I respond to Dunlurken again. I mean she's never been the sharpest tool in the shed, but she's being deliberately stupid in this trial.



:slap: ------->Here ya go!

:slap: ------->I replied too! :bang:
 
I like him. I like how he looks at the jury and tells them things very simply and directly.

I think he is a very good witness as well....I don't think Plourd will shake him...although, he'll take a week to find that out. :crazy:
 
Didn't that sound like he is standing by his ruling that Caplan has to testify?

Oh, and is this my 7,000 post???
:woohoo:
 
Defense exhibit IIIII Who came up with this absurd system of identifying exhibits?
It sure seems like it could get very confusing. Why not just put a "D" before a set of numbers?
 
Court is back in session. Plourd is asking Renteria if he's done research on luminol. What????? :rolleyes:
 
Hi there! I am new here, but I am not new to this trial. I do know some of you, however.:dance:
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
191
Guests online
2,239
Total visitors
2,430

Forum statistics

Threads
603,764
Messages
18,162,688
Members
231,847
Latest member
ffhvcbcat
Back
Top