This link has some info on CG including the video.
http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/re...e/news-story/75030d789f420f87a4040e02cad8aac3
http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/re...e/news-story/75030d789f420f87a4040e02cad8aac3
The video is four years old, I believe. It was produced to promote his ministry, which includes helping victims know what to do and how to survive an abduction. That it would bear some resemblance to this (and probably many other) abduction cases is to be expected. No?
BBM - With all due respect, this sounds like siccing the dogs on someone. I'm no fan of this man's approach. But he did not insert himself into the case. By all accounts, the Papinis contacted him (likely out of sheer desperation).
http://www.actionnewsnow.com/news/ransom-negotiator-offers-reward-for-sherri-papinin-s-return/
Oy. I don't know everything about him but I learn more every hour. lol
Until I get specific direction from Tricia let's keep it contained to what his qualifications are as a "hostage negotiator". And why the Sheriff said he was "adamantly against" Gamble's involvement. That's fair enough for now.
BBM - With all due respect, this sounds like siccing the dogs on someone. I'm no fan of this man's approach. But he did not insert himself into the case. By all accounts, the Papinis contacted him (likely out of sheer desperation).
http://www.actionnewsnow.com/news/ransom-negotiator-offers-reward-for-sherri-papinin-s-return/
The way I am understanding it, Gamble contacted him first, through a mutual friend. Then KP pondered it, and contacted Gamble and asked him for the help that had been already offered.
Really? Really? LE doesn't owe anything to me, you or the public except solving this case.
How many females buy a dark SUV without having kids or a family or not driving a male suv that they know?
So imo.
If the woman owned the suv.
Then they usually have kids or family in towe. Jmo.
So please remember. Jmo.
If she was chained to the steering wheel, you would think she was in the front seat. This seems stange if she always had a bag over her head, more people could see her. It would seem they would have her lay down in the back seat, so she wouldn't been seen.I never imagined that SP was taken places in a vehicle thru the 21 days she was held captive, but on the 20/20 interview, KP said whenever she was taken any place in the vehicle, she was chained to the steering wheel. I wonder where they took her and for what purpose.
Not meant in that sense at all. My intent was explore any other avenues and get off the merry-go-round that was going in circles nowhere. I only mentioned him because he is sleuthable since he is a public figure who has spoken out publicly regarding his involvement in this case.
Oy. I don't know everything about him but I learn more every hour. lol
Until I get specific direction from Tricia let's keep it contained to what his qualifications are as a "hostage negotiator". And why the Sheriff said he was "adamantly against" Gamble's involvement. That's fair enough for now.
I agree. Kind of like when you are searching for a lost item, you find it only after you have focused on a different task.
So, does anyone have questions about the anonymous donor? I have never heard of a stranger donating so much money for a kidnap victim. Wasn't it up to $100,000. towards the end?
So there can be no misunderstanding, I'll clarify the parameters/rules for posting in this thread -
- Sherri and Keith are victims. LE has confirmed this. Sherri clearly was beaten and tortured for 22 days. Keith passed a polygraph and LE has stated he has fully cooperated and they have explicitly cleared him. That means no bashing, insinuating they are anything but victims and no more sleuthing either of their social media pages.
- No references, not even thinly veiled ones, regarding the 13 year old blog entry allegedly authored by SP. None. ZERO TOLERANCE
- Any violations will result in an immediate loss of posting privileges.
Guys, there are a LOT more angles to sleuth. Aren't y'all getting dizzy? . I urge you to jump down from the Sherri & Keith carousel and look down other avenues. Gamble might be an interesting start.... He's a public figure who willingly inserted himself into this case and the sheriff is on record for being adamantly against his involvement. Just a suggestion....
I had a thought that the donor could be the church he's affiliated with, the "out of area" thing could be to deflect from thatI agree. Kind of like when you are searching for a lost item, you find it only after you have focused on a different task.
So, does anyone have questions about the anonymous donor? I have never heard of a stranger donating so much money for a kidnap victim. Wasn't it up to $100,000. towards the end?
If she was chained to the steering wheel, you would think she was in the front seat. This seems stange if she always had a bag over her head, more people could see her. It would seem they would have her lay down in the back seat, so she wouldn't been seen.
I'd have to watch again (and really need to as I was moderating while watching last night), however what I recall was Keith answering questions that the reporter asked him. Most of the questions were about his wife's injuries, her release from her captors, how he felt upon first seeing her, the reunion with their children, etc...
There were clips including the sheriff and Gamble (the "hostage negotiator")..... If the question was posed by the reporter regarding what LE was doing to arrest these perps, I am going to assume it was probably asked of the Sheriff. I truly don't recall that though.
It's not just the business name. This means his corporation is no longer allowed to do business in CA. In California you have to file a yearly statement with the Secretary of State and pay a nominal fee ($25) to keep the corporation valid.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk