I would really like to know how this went down with CG as he apparently showed up very early on:
KRCR first received this letter in an email from bringsherrihome@gmail.com, sent on November 6. In that email, the anonymous source said they were willing to provide proof that they had that kind of money available and were willing to release bank statements showing such. KRCR was unable to confirm the letter was from a legitimate source, and chose not to make the letter public at that time.
http://www.krcrtv.com/news/local/sh...sherri-papini-website-offers-reward/168229851
Also Gamble himself said he was acting independently of the family while the sister said the family has no association with it:
We are offering this reward with no strings attached," Gamble told the Record Searchlight Thursday. "We have not been talking with the police on this. Were acting independent from the family as well....
Papinis sister, Sheila Koester, said she had no knowledge about the letter and that the Papini family members had no association with the website.
I have no idea. Its nothing that I knew of, she said.
http://www.redding.com/news/local/P...ffers-reward-for-missing-woman-401771575.html
I'm reading everyone's posts, but mostly only here at this point awaiting apprehension of these beasts, and subsequent justice for Sherri. The tedious mountain of details are secondary to me now. But I am interested in what everyone thinks about the motive ... if you believe Sherri knows why this happened, why would she want it kept secret? Thoughts, please.
I have a million questions! Or at least 100,000.
Who? Why? How did this person learn about the case and decide to contact CG? I mean, did he or she just google "hostage negotiator redding"?
And I don't mean to suggest anything KP or SP did was fake, but does the anon donor exist? Could it just be one of CG's tactics?
Lucky guess maybe?Thank you for allowing some more discussion of CGs role as a consultant in this case.
First, if I may, Id like to repeat a question I asked on an earlier thread, because I dont think anyone posted an answer. How did CG know, in his November 22 video message to the kidnappers, that there were multipleat least twokidnappers? See thread 15 post 749 for some more detail on this. No one else knew until November 24.
Second, to understand CGs present-day work, its interesting to note that it is based on the US militarys SERE training, as his Rotary Club bio makes clear:
http://www.directory-online.com/Rotary/Accounts/5160/Downloads/0/July 2013 news/project taken.pdf
Coincidentally, in a case chock full of coincidences, a SERE training regimen lasts three weeks. Source follows.
https://www.army.mil/article/138765/SERE_training_develops_leaders_for_complex_environment
I find this most interesting.....
"Assisting in kidnap and ransom, hostage negotiation, extraction, resolution at %100 success rate."
Written yesterday at 7:01 pm.
So, either his job as their negotiator was done at %100 or he is lying and full of himself. I suspect door #1. JMO
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1292895514096778&id=232665370119803
I agree that the 20/20 special was interviewer driven. I think the interviewer was asked to stay away from some topics by LE (jmo), and KP wasn't about to rock the boat by showing his anger and demanding their capture. My opinion only, but I think he's grateful they didn't kill her and maybe feels an obligation to be submissive.
He needs to man-up, seriously. Stop doing interviews. Stop crying for the media. Take care of your family and embrace that well-earned anger.
I'm reading everyone's posts, but mostly only here at this point awaiting apprehension of these beasts, and subsequent justice for Sherri. The tedious mountain of details are secondary to me now. But I am interested in what everyone thinks about the motive ... if you believe Sherri knows why this happened, why would she want it kept secret? Thoughts, please.
I'm once again confused...I though Gamble (via mutual friend) contacted the P family:
According to the woman who stepped forward, she knew of CG because he gave a presentation at their church. He taught missionaries how to stay safe in foreign countries. And he apparently was familiar with negotiating ransoms for their release.
So this woman, who was a friend of the Papini family, thought it might be useful to introduce CG to them.
That's what I understand, but might be wrong...?
Wouldn't the brand reveal the motive even if Sherri didn't want to tell anyone what it was?
Is Sex Trafficking considered to be a random or targeted crime?