Thats not a friend. That his step dad.
Oh. Well, he should know then.
Thats not a friend. That his step dad.
I'm thinking she had the iPhone 6 or 6s. The iPhone 7 would require use of wireless headphones.
I found the article on Facebook and clicked on it. Then I could see the comments. Nothing stood out?
I'm not sure about abduction yet, but I do think the searches stopped early on for a reason. Hopefully FBI is helpful. I also hope they do a press conference soon!Ah. I apologize - I'm an amateur. It was a person saying he lived exactly one mile away and never been interviewed or approached by LEO. I believe that LEO stopped their search early on because they found a credible lead. I know there are many possible scenarios but I'm also strongly leaning on abduction.
I also look at the neighborhood as a remote area. I'm not from there, but when people were saying that it's heavy traffic area, I wasn't picturing a place where the homes are spaced an acre, or more apart. It seems more private. Like it would be easy to commit a crime without anybody noticing.
That is why I believe she was not jogging at the time...it well may have happened at or near her home...jmo
Do we have proof of this? It would seem odd that no one has mentioned an ex.Yes, she had been married before. Someone had the link from CA courts, but I forgot who had it or when she was divorced. I think ~2 yrs before she married KP.
Going from memory only.
An area can be rural but still well-trafficked. For instance there's family ranch property where people are on hundreds of acres each but share a common road so there is frequent daytime activity by both residents and the oil company that extracts from there. The oil company workers caught someone stealing scrap metal from our property and that thief got arrested because he was operating by that road during the day even though it was miles off the main road on a private dirt road in ultra low density population. The family ranch property area makes where this alleged kidnapping took place look like NYC.
Do we have proof of this? It would seem odd that no one has mentioned an ex.
Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk
iPhone 7 comes with an adapter that allows you to use regular headphones.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Could be she was being harassed by someone or they think the connection to the missing girl they went to hs with is too coincidental.What makes a husband, SIL, and parents all immediately say they think she was 'abducted'? Just thinking out loud and sharing ... because no one, absolutely no one in the family has said any other reason for her disappearance as their 'primary' belief. I just listened to all video's we've found as a sound check. And, to be so definitive about that statement. And the "bring her back".
Beginning to think the family knows who might have 'abducted' her. Which says what to you'll?
Interesting.
I've been thinking that whoever did this (assuming it was stranger abduction) had to either not have a daytime job OR a daytime job that involved driving.
hmmm...
jmopinion at the moment
Wait what? The phone and earphones were not found together?? I had assumed that they were found attached -phone, earphones and hair all togetherI was here a couple of days ago when this was covered pretty thoroughly. Evidence marker 1 was at the phone, evidence marker 2 was the earbuds, and evidence marker 3 was a black glove. The tape around the glove was the marker. Go back and find it the in thread, its there.
It is very concerning and I really pray it is not connected to SP's disappearance. There is also a report on page 19 of the 11/13 report about a missing person and others possibly being held near the Shasta Dam. I don't know if this is the same area as the Jones Valley Public Ramp. Are there any locals on the thread familiar with these locations and are they known to be trouble areas?