Found Alive CA - Sherri Papini, 34, Redding, 2 November 2016 - #6

[Gardener1850]

Is the picture of sherri in the blue and white top a recent picture?

Does anybody know where i.can find a recent picture of sherri?

There appears to be some more recent pictures here: http://www.helpfindsherripapini.com/gallery

Here kids are currently 2 and 4 so I think the Halloween pics where they are dressed as cowboys are from this year. JMO.

 

[skibaboo]

There appears to be some more recent pictures here: http://www.helpfindsherripapini.com/gallery

Here kids are currently 2 and 4 so I think the Halloween pics where they are dressed as cowboys are from this year. JMO.

And the ones where her son is wearing the orange top and yep, halloween going by the pumpkins

 

[TigerLilly]

Linked there http://www.helpfindsherripapini.com/

Did it get a new update? it looks much better and the photos in the gallery are much better too. I may have missed it, see what the ransom malarkey site did? Distracted, me anyway

What a sweet family. Their smiles shine in their eyes. I hope Sherri is found soon.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

 

[kfed83]

Found her named listed as a donor to this organization. Don't know how that means anything or why I'm posting it. Just got excited to actually find something in my searches. It was prior to her marriage so it's her maiden name and located in Northern California in her area so I'm just assuming. Nothing too exciting or probably relevant.

https://www.womenshealthspecialists.org/assets/uploads/2016/08/2006.pdf



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I saw that too. Also, in what I had hoped was a stroke of genius, I started searching for anything online where she used her (I assume) previous married name. No luck though. Either there's not much out there, or she didn't take the name of her ex at the time.

 

[TigerLilly]

Found her named listed as a donor to this organization. Don't know how that means anything or why I'm posting it. Just got excited to actually find something in my searches. It was prior to her marriage so it's her maiden name and located in Northern California in her area so I'm just assuming. Nothing too exciting or probably relevant.

https://www.womenshealthspecialists.org/assets/uploads/2016/08/2006.pdf



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Be aware there is another Sherri Graeff in Nov. CA with a different married name.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

 

[IllinoisMissing]

I saw that too. Also, in what I had hoped was a stroke of genius, I started searching for anything online where she used her (I assume) previous married name. No luck though. Either there's not much out there, or she didn't take the name of her ex at the time.

Ditto. I found it weeks ago. Nothing under her ex husbands name...perhaps she never took it.

Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk

 

[IllinoisMissing]

Be aware there is another Sherri Graeff in Nov. CA with a different married name.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

You know I initially thought that as well and then couldn't locate her again.

Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk

 

[Alexsea]

You know I initially thought that as well and then couldn't locate her again.

Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk

Me too...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[JDauxa]

Is it just me or does no one else think this "kidnap ransom" thing is off the wall??? Who is this guy? Why is he focusing on Sherri? DOes he think this is a movie and Mel Gibson is lurking around the corner? I mean really, I find the whole thing totally bizarre and DISTRACTING to finding Sherri.

Its interesting to see this perspective regarding the ransom reward. Personally I think it's out of the box approach to do anything to get her back safe. I didn't really take it as off the wall but rather a different tactic we just haven't seen utilized in missing cases before. One concern I do have is if this approach gains momentum, perps catch on and start abducting people in turn for reward money.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[TigerLilly]

You know I initially thought that as well and then couldn't locate her again.

Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk

Yeah....not sure the record you found is the "other" Sherri..just pointing it out. She is on FB and her married name starts with an M.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

 

[IllinoisMissing]

Yeah....not sure the record you found is the "other" Sherri..just pointing it out. She is on FB and her married name starts with an M.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Yes that one but later i wasn't sure she really was in California.

Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk

 

[TigerLilly]

Me too...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Well..I can't find her either. Maybe she hid her FB because of the similar name

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

 

[alicebk]

Can we try to confirm if there's another person named Sherri Graeff in norther CA, using another name due to marriage? Never saw any sign of that. There is someone with a hyphenated name in another state...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[kfed83]

Yes that one but later i wasn't sure she really was in California.

Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk

<modsnip> I've come across her in searches but don't remember any references to CA.

 

[soanyway]

Exactly. The Washington woman was abducted a day after the announcement of this ransom, and yet these are very rare in the U.S..

Its interesting to see this perspective regarding the ransom reward. Personally I think it's out of the box approach to do anything to get her back safe. I didn't really take it as off the wall but rather a different tactic we just haven't seen utilized in missing cases before. One concern I do have is if this approach gains momentum, perps catch on and start abducting people in turn for reward money.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Gardener1850]

Can we try to confirm if there's another person named Sherri Graeff in norther CA, using another name due to marriage? Never saw any sign of that. There is someone with a hyphenated name in another state...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It does appear there is another SG born in the 1970's. Look at this: https://familysearch.org/search/record/results?count=20&query=+givenname:Sherri~ +surname:Graeff

Top search result is our missing Sherri (DOB 1982), second one is a different DOB.

 

[kfed83]

J'accuse!

Sorry, just testing, testing.

I'm just not sure if we're allowed to post it or not so I'm erring on the side of caution. If you search below using her maiden name and keep going back you can find the divorce case docket.

http://caselookup.shasta.courts.ca.gov:8080/cgi-bin/webcase01r

 

[wfgodot]

I'm just not sure if we're allowed to post it or not so I'm erring on the side of caution. If you search below using her maiden name and keep going back you can find the divorce case docket.

http://caselookup.shasta.courts.ca.gov:8080/cgi-bin/webcase01r

Gotcha. Thanks.

 

[Inthedetails]

(Stagehand somewhat wearily hauls this out again.)

So what happened, ya think? List your top 3 or 5 or dozen, in order. No. 2 pencil.

Possibilities

.1. Abducted by person known to her; still alive
.2. Abducted by person known to her; now deceased
.3. Abducted by unknown party; still alive
.4. Abducted by unknown party; now deceased
.5. Murdered by known person; jog a red herring
.6. Hit by car; driver fled scene with body
.7. Suicide; body undiscovered
.8. Amnesia
.9. Hoax
10. Wilfully missing
11. Witness protection
12. Human traffickers
13. Space aliens
14. Crazy clowns
.
.

I can't decide which one is my top hunch, but these are the three on my list:

4. Abducted by unknown party; now deceased
5. Murdered by known person; jog a red herring
9. Hoax


jmo

 

[Alexsea]

I'm just not sure if we're allowed to post it or not so I'm erring on the side of caution. If you search below using her maiden name and keep going back you can find the divorce case docket.

http://caselookup.shasta.courts.ca.gov:8080/cgi-bin/webcase01r

I posted the link a few threads back and it's been allowed to stand. Public record.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk