I think this person is local and did something to her and afterwards got rid of her belongings to lead the LE away from that area. again all of this is IMO
I thought that at first, but it wouldn't make much sense. The phone and the purse were found VERY close to her home, and her path of travel. If it was someone in that local area, wouldn't they want to not leave any clues so close to the her last seen place?
The contents of the purse seem to be a very big piece of evidence to me.
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Clue-Found-in-Sierra-Lamar-Disappearance-143815416.html
Conflicting reports as to what the "shirt" was.
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Roadblock-Set-in-Sierra-Lamar-Search-143968486.html
Has anyone confirmed whether the item found was a shirt, jersey, or sweatshirt?
CA CA - Sierra Lamar, 15, Santa Clara County, 16 March 2012 - #4 - Page 2 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
Post #27 shows the confusion further.
I think in the picture its probably a sweatshirt with or without a hood, as thats what the mom said, but it appears the item in the purse might not be a sweatshirt.
And I think its also relevent that the sharks had games on Thursday night, and Saturday night at home in SJ.
http://sharks.nhl.com/club/schedule.htm
She may have brought an extra pair of clothing, planning on not going home friday night (maybe spending the night at a friends?), but going to the Shark's game on Saturday.
Also, its been pretty cold in the area lately. If she removed the sweatshirt/shirt before leaving home and put it in the purse, i'd imagine she would grab another sweatshirt/sweater.
Im sure they've had her mom go through her clothing in her closet to see what is missing, right?
Lastly, a thought that really puzzles me about the purse. If the clothing in the purse is the clothing she ended up leaving the house in, how did it get off her and in the purse? If she WILLFULLY got in a car with someone she knew, or a stranger, would they cause a seen right in her neighboorhood, and then hang around and take the time remove her clothing? I would think if anything they would pretend to be driving her to school, or wherever she wanted to go for some time before she realized something was up.
So in that case, if she was taken, she probably didn't get in the car willfully, and instead was grabbed. But this still presents the issue of why someone would hang around to remove her clothing so they could dump it in the area.
I also didn't hear any metion of socks/shoes. If someone was dumping all of her stuff, i'd excpect her socks and shoes to have been found. So I would reason that this was either a spare change of clothes, or someone had her change into something else. I cant really conceive why someone would have her change into something else though. [EDIT] I could see changing clothing if someone abducted a very young child, but a perp wouldn't be worried about someone recognizing her based on her clothing. Either way, I think thats a big question.
Where are her shoes?
My opinions based on this are either:
a)she wasn't initially taken in a car. Instead it was someone's house or structure in the area. I doubt this though, because they've searched that area extensively. Also, if you lived in the area, you'd take the phone and purse farther away.
b)The clothing in the purse was a spare change. This doesn't necessarily lead to believing abduction or runaway, but it is much more reassuring than if those were all her clothes she were wearing.