Krystine
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2014
- Messages
- 676
- Reaction score
- 1
There's no reason to think that there was any conflict ... don't think anyone has suggested that.
I'm not implying anything. I'm questioning whether it is in the best interests of the child to be left in a home where 200 strangers had been in the previous three days, where nothing had been cleaned up - not even the "come on in" sign, where everything was for sale due to moving out of the country, and where the family breadwinner had declared bankruptcy that week. That is an awful lot of turmoil and upheaval in the house. I have no idea what decisions were made, or why they were made. I think it is truly tragic that Nathan was caught in a dispute between extended family members such that it cost him his life.
Some people live their lives with ease, others are more rigid.
How many victims of crime would re-think small decisions they made that had tragic consequences?
There is another thread I follow on WS, and someone has this as a signature line. I hope they don't mind me sharing it.
Paraphrasing here..."We are all just one poor decision away from being the subject of this forum".
The outcome was horrible, but in no way can we imply there was some kind of negligence in any shape or form.