Using a bit of inductive logic ... we have drag marks stretching 8 meters from the side door to the parking pad. A child could be carried, and a 200 pound man could not normally be dragged by one person. We have the Medical Examiner at the house, which normally means that there is blood and perhaps death, but not necessarily a body. We have the Amber Alert with a description of all three missing persons, and an additional note that the child may be with his grandfather. That suggests to me that the drag marks are blood, and that the blood is from a female.
From there, I would assume that the grandfather was asked to go outside to discuss business, and the grandmother and child remained in the house. Perhaps the grandfather sat in his truck to discuss patents, or money, and perhaps he sat in the suspicious green truck to do the same. I think he was attacked in one of the trucks. If he was attacked in the green truck, given that I think this was pre-meditated, I think that the owner placed plastic on the seats with an explanation that his mint condition truck is being preserved. After the grandfather was attacked, I think the grandmother was attacked, and her blood is represented in the drag marks. I don't want to think about what happened to the child, but the perp may have decided on a soft kill because it was a child. I obviously don't believe that any of these victims is alive. I don't think they were alive when the sun came up on June 30.
I think the green truck left the area with three bodies, the driver put the bodies in a premeditated location that he knows well, he then returned to the crime scene to clean up after himself, and he left for the last time between 4 and 4:30AM.
I think it's also possible that the owner of the mint condition green truck had extra seats for the truck and that he could have replaced them in the five days that he had between the discovery of the crime scene, and the time that he was detained for questioning.
