Deceased/Not Found Canada - Alvin, 66, & Kathy Liknes, 53, Nathan O'Brien, 5, Calgary, 30 June 2014 - #9

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/Canada/Calgary/ID/2472647024/
Published July 10, 2014

New details on missing Calgary boy, grandparents

This is not an official transcript and is not connected to any of the participants.
It is a rough draft, and all errors are my own.


Calgary Police Service Spokesman, Kevin Brockwell = KB

KB: As the investigation into the disappearance of Nathan O'Brien and Kathryn and Alvin Liknes moves into the eleventh day, teams continue to search Calgary area landfills and investigators continue to ask rural property owners to check their properties for anything unusual.

Yesterday, search teams sifted through garbage at the Spyhill Landfill site as part of a routine procedure to look for anything relevant to this ongoing investigation. Today, those teams have moved to a landfill off 17th Ave and 68th St SE. Additional search teams in partnership with the RCMP continue to cover a large area in and around the property in Airdrie in connection to this investigation.

Officers are also going door to door at neighbouring acreages asking residents to do a thorough check of their properties. And property owners as well as businesses are being asked to do the same.

Once again, we'd like to thank the media and the public for their assistance in this investigation, and continue to encourage anyone with information to please contact us or crime stoppers. And, tips can also be emailed to homicidetips@calgarypolice.ca.

You can appreciate there's limited information I could probably share, but I will ask or answer whatever questions I can at this time.

Reporter: Are there any indications that there's a meth lab or remnants of a meth lab on that property, on the property near Airdrie?

KB: I can confirm that a quantity of chemicals has been located at the Airdrie property. All I can say is that it is considered dangerous and flammable in nature and so we're taking precautions at that site for the officers who are out there conducting a search and handling or looking at that chemical, or those chemicals. Yesterday, we had adjacent ambulances for that purpose as well as for the folks that are out in the field doing the search. Today, there are some members of our tactical unit, explosive detection folks who are chemical experts and they're out there assessing as well. But, at this time we don't know if it's chemicals that are part of a typical farm operation or chemicals that could be used for something else. Until we know that those chemicals are, we can't say and it's too early to speculate what those may be or what they may be used for.

Reporter: Can you tell us why the landfills are being searched?

KB: In most major crimes cases, certainly in homicides and or in missing crimes or missing persons cases like this. I can tell you in this particular incident that shortly after the disappearance was reported, we made contact with the three landfill sites in Calgary and we asked that all refuse from the Calgary and surrounding area that goes to those three landfill sites be segregated off. In the early days in the investigation, we were following up on tips that were coming in from the public, and, as part of this ongoing investigation, that we had investigators that are going through that, those landfill sites in the area that had been segregated off to see if there's anything suspicious that may or may not be related to this file. So, that's the process that they're going through at this time.

Reporter: So, there was nothing significant that was leading you actually to the landfill, it was just procedural?

KB: Yeah. It was something that was activated the day off or the day after the disappearance.

Reporter: Did you find anything?

KB: There have been items that have taken, that have been taken from the landfill site, but we don't know if there is any relevance to this file or not. So, they're just looking for anything suspicious. Again, you can appreciate we're talking about all landfill that was collected for a number of days following the disappearance, so there is quite a quantity of refuse to go through. And so, it's not specific to that area, so they're going through everything and anything that might be suspicious we're taking as part of the investigation, we're having it checked. And, we don't know if it has any relevance to the file or not.

Reporter: Are you interested in the forensics? Have you, in fact, sent it to the crime lab?

KB: We have. Actually it's a constant process almost daily of things that we're sending up to the crime lab, still working closely with the crime lab who are expediting the work that they're doing on these items. And items are still coming back. Nothing that we can report on yet, but we are getting items back and forth every day.

Reporter: Is there anything that you can say about the investigation of Douglas Garland?

KB: Other than, of course, he remains a person of interest. He is still before the courts on the other matter. I understand that there are some conditions that the courts are requiring as to whether or not he is released. If he is released, he still remains a person of interest in this investigation, but he has not been formally charged. But, I can't get into specifics as to what we'll be doing as regards to the ongoing investigation and our interest in him.

Scrum.
Reporter: From a police standpoint, if tomorrow he's released what happens?

KB: He just remains a person of interest in this investigation, but I won't get into what we would doing or furthering as part of this investigation with regards to him.

Scrum
Reporter: Are you investigating into the business relationship between Mr. Garland and Alvin Liknes?

KB: I can tell you that there are some, there are some business issues that we're looking into. I can't get into specifics as to what those are, who was involved, what they look like, or how many people are involved, but yes, we have investigators looking into those allegations that there were some business issues. And we're dedicating a number of folks that are, are checking into that as well.

Reporter: How far, or how much would you say that the investigation has advanced in the last couple of days? Is it still moving forward?

KB: Absolutely. In fact, we were just talking to the homicide investigators, and they said that tips are still coming in, and there were a number of investigative avenues that they're following up on. So we were we are still moving forward on this investigation.

Reporter: Are those investigative avenues still linked to the Airdrie acreage or are you expecting to expand the search even further?

KB: Well, no. I mean the Airdrie location is just one of the avenues that we're following up on. There are a number of other avenues. Of course, the landfill sites are a part of that investigation, but there are other things that we're following up on that have come in as a result of this investigation, and so that it does still move forward, and there are a number of things that we are still following up on.

Reporter: Are you going to elaborate at all on what some of those leads might be?

KB: Not at this time, no.

Reporter: It's day eleven. Is there any kind of frustration with things?

KB: No, I don't think there's frustration. We remain hopeful that we locate the three people. We have dedicated a lot of resources and will continue to dedicate whatever resources we need. I know we have the same commitment from the RCMP, and we will continue on for as long as we need to on this investigation.

Reporter: Will you be looking into other landfills out in the country once you're done with the three landfills in Calgary?

KB: I can't say that for sure. I can just say that the three landfill sites in Calgary do take into account the Calgary and some other surrounding areas. So, at this time, I'm only aware of the three.

Reporter: Yesterday, Chief Hanson said that he had offers from other police jurisdictions to dedicate officers to check their jurisdictions.

KB: That's not uncommon. Usually in big situations, big files, big public events there's a lot of co-operation from across the country, and so it wouldn't be uncommon for other jurisdictions, and especially in Alberta, to offer up those resources. I can't say for sure at this time if we've taken them up on that, but certainly that is not uncommon. It's something that we, as the Calgary Police Service, often do as well.

Reporter: Is this still considered a missing persons file?

KB: Yes, it is.

Reporter: And Amber Alert still in effect?

KB: The Amber Alert is still in effect. I mean it's something that we assess on a day to day basis. It is a significant investigative strategy as part of this file. Tips do still come in, albeit they are slowing down from the early days when the Amber Alert was put out. But if tips are still coming in, it is very important and that information is critical for us to follow up on so until such time as we no longer get tips there, we're going to assess the Amber Alert on a day to day basis.

Reporter: With the passage of time, what is the possibility that these people might still be alive?

KB: I'm not gonna speculate. I'm just saying that we are hopeful that we will find them alive. And there is nothing to indicate otherwise. So, we will remain hopeful and will continue to work on this.

Reporter: I just wanted to follow up. And you say that you stay in touch with the family? This must be a gruelling time for them. How are they doing?

KB: Absolutely. Again, they're devastated. This is unfathomable what they're going through. I know that there's folks that are rallying behind them. Even tonight there's a candlelight vigil being organized by friends that's open to the public. So, you see a lot of community support. You see a lot of the family support. Everybody is watching this closely. Everybody wants to help. We're seeing a lot of offers for help and support from right across the city. And, that's typical of Calgary, so I know that the family appreciates that. They also appreciate the amount of resources and time that we're putting into this investigation. And so, nothing's going to change. We'll dedicate what we need to. And, as we said before, we'll continue on and no stone will be left unturned.

Reporter: Kevin, it was my impression an you say anything more specific about your going door to door?

KB: No. So what we said is even people in the community, around Park Hill, anybody. The amount of time it takes to check their property, rural properties. You know your property better than anybody else. You can see if anything's missing, if anything's been disturbed, if there's anything odd-- tire tracks, absolutely anything that's out of the ordinary. We would rather hear about it and follow up on it to see if there's any relevance or not. And that's what we're asking folks to do. So, take a bit of time, check your properties either in the city or rural. Businesses, some of the oil companies have well-heads, things like that. Sites that are not checked on a regular basis. So, we're asking,you know, take the time. Send folks out. Have a look around. If anything's suspicious, let us know. So, tips are still coming in, but that would be very, very helpful.

Reporter: You've reached out to the public a number of times over this last week and a half. How do you feel about what you've gotten back from your appeals to the public?

KB: Well, I mean that we're frustrated that we still have probably over half the folks from the estate sale that still haven't come forward. But, certainly the tips and the information that we've been receiving have been excellent, and a lot of that we're still following up on. So we'd really like anybody that hasn't talked to us yet, that was at the estate sale, just to give us a call and we'll do whatever we can to touch base with them in whatever way they need to. But, we're still waiting for half of those folks.

Reporter: In your experience, have you seen a case like this before?

KB: In my thirty-five years, no. And I've talked to other senior command people, senior investigators and this is a very, very unique case. But, you know, it doesn't matter, the type of case or how difficult it is. The same amount of dedication and resources and commitment to this file is given to all files, so we're just going to continue on with optimism and hope that we can still find these people.

Scrum.

KB: Go ahead.

Reporter: Why is this case so unique that you haven't seen anything like it in thirty-five years?

KB: Oh, no. It's just the fact that we're into eleven days. We have three missing people. We're still getting some tips. There are some investigative leads that we're following up on. And, as the days pass, it does pose its challenges so that's what makes it unique. You know, a lot of files can be solved quickly. At least you have suspects that you can follow up right away, so it's unique in that way. But, again, it doesn't change how we're responding to this file or the resources that we committed to it.

Reporter: What do you say to reassure the family?

KB: Well, I mean we're in contact with the family every day. They're, they're happy and satisfied with the amount of resources that are being put into this. We're trying to investigate-- keep them up on the investigation as much as we can with what we can share of course. And, certainly they're very appreciative of the support that they're getting from the community. So, I think from their perspective, I believe they think that everything that can be done is being done and will continue that way.

Reporter: You've been at that property for seven days now, are you finding anything new? Do you expect to find anything, or are you looking at what you have. I assume you've been through everything you have by this point?

KB: Well, we still hold that property, and we'll hold it indefinitely. As more information or leads or tips come in there may be things that we need to go back and look at. So at this point, the house has been thoroughly searched. Our forensic teams have been in there. But we are not releasing the property at this point.

Reporter: Is Doug Garland the only person of interest still?

KB: We have a number of investigative avenues that we're following up on. He remains as a person of interest, but I won't get into anything other than other investigative avenues that we're following up on.

Reporter: How long do you hold out hope for those people?

KB: Hold on a second. (Indicates reporter)

Reporter: He asked my question.

KB: (Turns back.) Sorry.

Reporter: How long do you hold out hope for those people?

KB: Indefinitely. Until we get information or evidence to change that. And at this point we have not, so we are hopeful and will remain that way until something changes.

Reporter: Can you tell us are there any other surveillance videos at all?

KB: Not that I'm aware of. At least I've been briefed on that I can share.

Reporter: There's other buildings and what not on that property

KB: Oh, sorry, the house in Parkhill has been thoroughly searched. We're still in the process of searching the property, outbuildings in the Airdrie area as well as surrounding properties. So that's still ongoing.

Reporter: How many investigators are involved? Sort of walk us through how many..

KB: Well, and it's not just investigators. There's a number of support people. We have community partners. We have some other agencies like the RCMP. I think on any given day there's probably more than a hundred touching this file in one way or another.

Reporter: What do you mean by community partners?

KB: Well, Alberta Health Services for example. We have used in Calgary our partners in Calgary Search and Rescue to help us. So there are other people involved, other than Calgary Police Service members.

Reporter: Were there any violent, signs of violence found out there on the acreage?

KB: Yeah, I won't comment on that.

Reporter: Have you been able to identify who the person was who was injured in the home yet?

KB: No, I won't comment on that.

PR: Just a couple more questions.

Reporter: There are business and financial connections between Doug Garland and Alvin Liknes. Some things have come out about that, some details about the business.

KB: Yeah, so we are aware of some business issues regarding the family and so we're just, we have officers or investigators that are looking a that to see if there is a connection to this disappearance.

Reporter: Are there any more charges that will face at this time?

KB: Not at this time that I'm aware. OK.
 
I am so curious to know if LE has checked out the enormous cattle feed lot that is located East of the Garland's property. It is very close to their acreage. Lots of easy access points into it and many, many areas to dispose of remains. The smell of the feed lot could easily disguise decomposition. Not many lights on at night around the lot either.
 
“I spoke with [Ms. Liknes], she seemed happy, telling us about how they were going to move and take a trip somewhere,” she said.
According to the woman, Mr. Liknes wasn’t very visible during the sale. When her boyfriend returned the next morning, he also spoke only with Ms. Liknes.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...ggle-with-grim-puzzle/article19682368/?page=1


ThIS.... THIS is what I have been wondering. One article said the office was cleared at the same time the sale was going on. Now, I don't know about others, but if I'm liquidating my entire personal belongings, then my husband best be helping me! But maybe Mrs. Liknes would rather work alone.

I'm really curious about this aspect. If Mr. Liknes was NOT at the home for the sale, and was indeed clearing out the office, (Where is the stuff from the office? In storage, or was it brought to the house to sell?) then there is a chance he was meeting up with folks, tying up loose ends, etc. I wonder if he talked to DG at all during that time frame!!

To those that haven't held a sale, IMO, it's work. And you're not guaranteed to sell anything, nor have people show up. I've held yardsales and had ONE person show up. Even with advertising! It's risky. But still LOTS of work. And doing it without help?? Well, I guess. If it was just yardsale items, and not everything in the home! Maybe she did like a friend of mine....he opened the house, had nothing priced, didn't dust anything, and sold for whatever people offered! Needless to say he had LOTS of stuff later that ended up at the Goodwill, and he rented a dump to finish clearing out the house. That was with 5 of us helping him!!! It was WORK!
 
According to a relative of Alvin Liknes, right, Douglas Garland, left, altered one of Liknes's patents and believed he should have been included as one of the inventors. Liknes paid for the work, but would not give Garland credit for the invention, said the family member, who described the dispute as "petty."

http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/0...y-says/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

The above is a quote below the photo of Alvin and Douglas. I'm sorry I'm not savy enough to know how to remove the black part...or change the font. However, IMO, it's important as it states what the problem with the patent was.

NVM...I figured out how to change the quote fonts and colors as it appeared all white when I first posted it!!! :thud:
 
According to recently obtained files, Mr. Liknes claimed his financial misfortune was the result of a bad investment.
“I owned a company by the name of A.C.L. Resources Ltd. that lent substantial funds to related company Cherhill Resources, who in turn invested in a gold mine. Cherhill eventually went into bankruptcy. A.C.L. was unable to use the loss for tax purposes,” Mr. Liknes wrote. At the time A.C.L. owed money to Revenue Canada and was unable to pay the bill.
“I am now faced with a large tax debt personally due to a reassessment that I am unable to pay.”

http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/0...y-says/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
 
Mr. Liknes was also a majority owner of Cherhill Resources. The file showed he sold a lot on Vancouver Island for $32,000 to prop up the company. It went bankrupt shortly afterward.
Mr. Liknes’s bankruptcy was contentious.
Another item in his file showed that he was sued by a man named Harris N. Hanson, who claimed the businessman had made “material misrepresentations” that allegedly induced Mr. Hanson to advance $25,000 to Cherhill Resources Inc.
The bankruptcy file also revealed that Mr. Liknes was an employee of, and had been offered options to purchase shares in, a company called Granisko Resources Inc., which also subsequently went bankrupt.
In the ‘90s, Granisko took out junk bonds in order to finance natural gas plays; by 1995, it owed $56-million — more than its assets were worth in the face of declining natural gas prices, according to the Globe and Mail at the time.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/0...y-says/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
 
Meanwhile, Mr. Liknes’s business dealings faced the scrutiny of police trying to find a motive for the trio’s disappearance.
The most recent business failure was Winter Petroleum Ltd., a natural gas exploration company that operated in the Rainbow Lake and High Level area. Mr. Liknes ran the company for three years until it went bankrupt days before he disappeared. Amid declining returns for natural gas, it found itself $800,000 in arrears for property taxes and penalties.
“During the last three years where Alvin was with Winter, we were having a very tough time with historic low gas prices and high operating costs and high taxes. There was no money left,” said Marek Kozera, one of the employees and directors of the firm.
However, Winter was not working with any of Mr. Liknes’s patents, he said.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/0...y-says/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
 
liknes-home1.jpg


http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/0...y-says/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Note the window over the memorial. It has the same look as we've seen in earlier photos. Wondering if a film was on the window to prevent damage to furniture from the bright sunlight, and for whatever reason, it's missing in that one section of window. Looks like the shadow from the tree is making it so you can see the curtain.
 
I can't recall but I don't *think* I've seen this yet.
What if DG HAD to take either AL or KL with him, away from the property for some reason? To retrieve something... show them something..?
It would have been so much easier to fake a CO2 poisoning, or like someone above just said, walk in, shoot them and walk away.

There is some reason why they were removed from the home. Now what was it?
Good thought.

It's possible that Garland wanted information, maybe he wanted Liknes to sign a document related to a patent etc.

I do also wonder if Garland was ticked about his sister being with another Liknes, some he was clearly bitter.

Just throwing that out there, not really thinking these things happened, but, you never know
 
I think he has Aspergers.

As a former special Ed teacher, the best way to agitate him and get him out of his element (to increase the still slim possibility that he'll talk) is to expose him to the rest of the prison population.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How can you judge that? We know very little about him, and I don't think that diagnosis can be made without a professional IMHO
 
Are we even sure that they are blood/drag marks... if I remember correctly they never did confirm blood at the scene... I would just assume they are bloody drag marks but how can we be sure?

It has not been confirmed but there is a video where it looks pretty obvious that it is blood. In one of the splits in the pavement there is a little spot that has been missed, and it the colour of dried blood.

http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/Canada/Edmonton/ID/2471087671/. At a just over a minute in they show them.
 
“I spoke with [Ms. Liknes], she seemed happy, telling us about how they were going to move and take a trip somewhere,” she said.
According to the woman, Mr. Liknes wasn’t very visible during the sale. When her boyfriend returned the next morning, he also spoke only with Ms. Liknes.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...ggle-with-grim-puzzle/article19682368/?page=1


ThIS.... THIS is what I have been wondering. One article said the office was cleared at the same time the sale was going on. Now, I don't know about others, but if I'm liquidating my entire personal belongings, then my husband best be helping me! But maybe Mrs. Liknes would rather work alone.

I'm really curious about this aspect. If Mr. Liknes was NOT at the home for the sale, and was indeed clearing out the office, (Where is the stuff from the office? In storage, or was it brought to the house to sell?) then there is a chance he was meeting up with folks, tying up loose ends, etc. I wonder if he talked to DG at all during that time frame!!

To those that haven't held a sale, IMO, it's work. And you're not guaranteed to sell anything, nor have people show up. I've held yardsales and had ONE person show up. Even with advertising! It's risky. But still LOTS of work. And doing it without help?? Well, I guess. If it was just yardsale items, and not everything in the home! Maybe she did like a friend of mine....he opened the house, had nothing priced, didn't dust anything, and sold for whatever people offered! Needless to say he had LOTS of stuff later that ended up at the Goodwill, and he rented a dump to finish clearing out the house. That was with 5 of us helping him!!! It was WORK!

The article you quoted was a good read!

This one line really stood out to me
Both men may have also shared investments that went badly. (in regards to AL and DG)

So it looks like there were more business dealings aside from the pump patent.
 
How can you judge that? We know very little about him, and I don't think that diagnosis can be made without a professional IMHO

I have Aspergers myself and said earlier that I thought he *might have it too. Of course most Aspies are not murderers. A special ed teacher or psychologist would be better at recognizing the signs. I think it was an astute observation and an opinion, not intended to be a diagnosis.

I just want to point out that Aspergers is not a mental illness. It is a neurological disorder and does not imply and lack of conscience or moral fiber.

Also Aspies do crave social interaction and want to have friends but it is just more difficult for us.

On further thought, after reading that article, it seems like DG might have had anti-social personality disorder.

Again I am just making guesses here and I am in no way claiming any of this as fact.
 
Are we even sure that they are blood/drag marks... if I remember correctly they never did confirm blood at the scene... I would just assume they are bloody drag marks but how can we be sure?

Hey sublimemumma... Not sure I understand your post... Mine did not mention drag marks or blood ...I was posting about the condition of the hose. The hose appear to indicate that something was cleaned... Whatever that something was, we are not sure but we can guess it may be blood based on some if the early news footage.

In the photo I posted there is definitely a decent amount of "thick", dark substance that seems to have pooled in the concrete agains the step, at the side door.... I'm not 100% convinced that it is blood personally.

There is a video posted by peony27... I believe it is more indicative that there was droplets of blood, at least, in the cleaned up fluid:

It has not been confirmed but there is a video where it looks pretty obvious that it is blood. In one of the splits in the pavement there is a little spot that has been missed, and it the colour of dried blood.

http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/Canada/Edmonton/ID/2471087671/. At a just over a minute in they show them.

I don't think the droplets of blood mean that the large drag marks were blood. In fact the droplets of "possible dried blood" in the video, make a much more compelling case that it was DG bleeding a little bit as he attempted a clean up.

The big question...which I posed in relation to the hose, is why the clean up?!? A clean-up takes times and has significant potential of leaving your own DNA at the scene(which may have happened if I'm right about the blood)...

A neighbour could have hear something at any time during such a clean-up and called police. If DG actually stuck around to clean the side walk, hang the hose ect... Then what gave him the confidence that he was safe from police showing up right in the middle of the act and catching him with all 3 victems.

Something is very off here... Also I remember a user "Dangeross" posted quite a bit in earlier threads... He hasn't posted in some time however, he claimed to "know" that the substance on the sidewalk was NOT blood and rather something that verifies HR.
 
According to a relative of Alvin Liknes, right, Douglas Garland, left, altered one of Liknes's patents and believed he should have been included as one of the inventors. Liknes paid for the work, but would not give Garland credit for the invention, said the family member, who described the dispute as "petty."

http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/0...y-says/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

The above is a quote below the photo of Alvin and Douglas. I'm sorry I'm not savy enough to know how to remove the black part...or change the font. However, IMO, it's important as it states what the problem with the patent was.

NVM...I figured out how to change the quote fonts and colors as it appeared all white when I first posted it!!! :thud:

I've always thought this wasn't about money or business but rather a sense of principal (or DG's maybe warped sense of principal). If DG felt he was wronged or his idea was stolen, or maybe it was his idea and he wasn't given credit, or whatever, I could see that being grounds for him to become infuriated especially if he feels intellectually superior to those who might get the credit! He might be a science guy, but I know with creative/artist types, there's nothing more annoying than someone copying your artistic style/work or stealing a creative idea - it's not about money IMO.
 
There has been much discussion around the bankruptcies, etc., and also vagueness regarding KL's employment. I am wondering just HOW the Ls were living on a daily basis, financially. We all know what it takes to run a household day to day and how much everything costs, from groceries to utilities and insurances, etc. I live a frugal life but am often amazed at just how much money I go through monthly. AL would have CPP and OAP pension income, but KL would have no government pensions as of yet. Neither of them seemed to have a steady employment income that could be counted on... unless I have missed that memo. I just wonder how they had 'managed' financially up until this terrible event?
 
All caught up!

I thought for sure AL, KL and NO would be found by now. So sad to see the recent murder charges and re-arrest of DG.
 
Hey sublimemumma... Not sure I understand your post... Mine did not mention drag marks or blood ...I was posting about the condition of the hose. The hose appear to indicate that something was cleaned... Whatever that something was, we are not sure but we can guess it may be blood based on some if the early news footage.

In the photo I posted there is definitely a decent amount of "thick", dark substance that seems to have pooled in the concrete agains the step, at the side door.... I'm not 100% convinced that it is blood personally.

There is a video posted by peony27... I believe it is more indicative that there was droplets of blood, at least, in the cleaned up fluid:



I don't think the droplets of blood mean that the large drag marks were blood. In fact the droplets of "possible dried blood" in the video, make a much more compelling case that it was DG bleeding a little bit as he attempted a clean up.

The big question...which I posed in relation to the hose, is why the clean up?!? A clean-up takes times and has significant potential of leaving your own DNA at the scene(which may have happened if I'm right about the blood)...

A neighbour could have hear something at any time during such a clean-up and called police. If DG actually stuck around to clean the side walk, hang the hose ect... Then what gave him the confidence that he was safe from police showing up right in the middle of the act and catching him with all 3 victems.

Something is very off here... Also I remember a user "Dangeross" posted quite a bit in earlier threads... He hasn't posted in some time however, he claimed to "know" that the substance on the sidewalk was NOT blood and rather something that verifies HR.

My post wasn't just related to you post about the hose... I was just wondering if it ha been confirmed about the blood. And wondering aloud why the clean up when it seems there wasn't much clean up done in the house. If indeed it was HIS blood on the driveway that would definately be a reason to try to clean it up...
 
Quote Originally Posted by Leeby View Post
Hey sublimemumma... Not sure I understand your post... Mine did not mention drag marks or blood ...I was posting about the condition of the hose. The hose appear to indicate that something was cleaned... Whatever that something was, we are not sure but we can guess it may be blood based on some if the early news footage.

In the photo I posted there is definitely a decent amount of "thick", dark substance that seems to have pooled in the concrete agains the step, at the side door.... I'm not 100% convinced that it is blood personally.

There is a video posted by peony27... I believe it is more indicative that there was droplets of blood, at least, in the cleaned up fluid:



I don't think the droplets of blood mean that the large drag marks were blood. In fact the droplets of "possible dried blood" in the video, make a much more compelling case that it was DG bleeding a little bit as he attempted a clean up.

The big question...which I posed in relation to the hose, is why the clean up?!? A clean-up takes times and has significant potential of leaving your own DNA at the scene(which may have happened if I'm right about the blood)...

A neighbour could have hear something at any time during such a clean-up and called police. If DG actually stuck around to clean the side walk, hang the hose ect... Then what gave him the confidence that he was safe from police showing up right in the middle of the act and catching him with all 3 victems.

Something is very off here... Also I remember a user "Dangeross" posted quite a bit in earlier threads... He hasn't posted in some time however, he claimed to "know" that the substance on the sidewalk was NOT blood and rather something that verifies HR.
My post wasn't just related to you post about the hose... I was just wondering if it ha been confirmed about the blood. And wondering aloud why the clean up when it seems there wasn't much clean up done in the house. If indeed it was HIS blood on the driveway that would definately be a reason to try to clean it up...

Sorry, I don't know how to multi-quote yet. But FWIW, I was watching the thread regarding Dangeross and [modsnip], I thought he was, IMO, referring to DNA inside the house that indicated none of the victims left the house alive. I don't think he was trying to identify the drag marks. IMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
169
Guests online
1,479
Total visitors
1,648

Forum statistics

Threads
598,551
Messages
18,083,126
Members
230,657
Latest member
cshh74
Back
Top