In the link provided above.... the first post:
It’s all sourced information in the Star, not tested in court, so we don’t know.
They had joint holdings, but we know at least the new home was in Honey’s name only.
My point was if this was staged to look like a m/s I would think the ‘murderers’ estate might be open to claims from the victim’s loved ones. Eg: Mary.
Not qualified to argue with you, stepping off here... : )
Lexiintoronto,
Jun 25, 2019 Report
#1141 Like
This sparked a thought.. The family has vehemently been opposed to police intimating this crime was a M/S. If one of a married couple murders their other half, then that precludes the killer from receiving the Willed proceeds of the victim's estate.
Some have pondered the possibilities of who the murder(s) could be, with some suggesting it could not have been people included in the Will, since why would those bewneficiaries be opposed to police making a M/S determination.
I wonder if the estate has been frozen until the resolution of this double homicide has been solved, since.. what IF... ??