Thanks dotr. I paid the fee to subscribe, but the story didn’t really tell us imo what really swayed the police to proclaim it a double murder. No conclusive info regarding whether their wrists were bound at some point (in fact the article seems to raise the possibility that these could be old markings on the wrists), and also no conclusion or definitive answer re what was used to cause the ligature neck compression- the belts or something else?
Turns out The Sherman’s house had been broken into within 2 years of the deaths, through a skylight. That may be why police were on the roof. Numerous breaking had occurred in the neighbourhood within a few years of the deaths.
Finally, my impression of the original pathologist based on the article was that he seemed relatively inexperienced. Did you get the same impression?
Thinking the m/m versus m/s came down to the hyoid bone. Neither B nor HS had a fractured one, which apparently would signify murder.
Earlier research by the pathologists showed that this is not necessarily true. a
imo, speculation.
Barry and Honey Sherman: how the second autopsy revealed it was a double murder | The Star
"Barry Sherman’s hyoid bone had been removed in the earlier autopsy by Pickup. But through information provided to Chiasson that day, he came to understand that neither Barry nor Honey’s hyoid bone was fractured. Chiasson wondered if that was why police thought it was a murder-suicide. As he had shown with his research years before, a murder with a soft ligature could leave an intact hyoid.rbbm