1) BS discovered marital infidelity of HS and reacted in a rage. Sometimes in these instances a violent reaction is not unusual, as most people know from MSM and from WS. If the personal trainer, I wonder if HS advised the household staff to take Friday off when the trainer was coming to the house- they would be able to provide TPS with this information.
2) HS wanted out of the marriage- perhaps she had had enough of living with a workaholic husband who didn't share some or even any of her interests, and she wanted to enjoy her remaining years doing what she wanted to do. BS by all accounts couldn't accept losing at anything, and he knew that a divorce would potentially result in him not being able to retain ownership of Apotex. Maybe that was enough to put him over the edge.
3) BS seemed to feel almost guilty about his wealth, and perhaps even not worthy of it- evidence his conversation with the Senator at her cottage party as recounted at the memorial service. Maybe he just reached the point where he couldn't handle these feelings anymore, and the final straw for him was triggered by HS discussing their huge multi million dollar new house with their architect on Wed night. Perhaps they argued when they got home and he reacted violently.
It's time to get off the fence folks. All MOO
rsbm.
I so appreciate your point of view and well thought out response. My thoughts on these theories are as follows:
1. If there was marital infidelity, why assume it was on behalf of HS? To me it could go either way. HS could have confronted BS on his infidelity, and he responded in a rage to put her in her place. To implement the personal trainer in an affair because he showed up for an appointment, seems silly to me. In most domestic violence cases, it's the perpetrator that always possesses the upper hand and exercises control in all forms of the relationship. But what throws me off is the ligature. In a moment of rage, I see manual strangulation as more plausible than ligature. The ligature suggests to me planning on behalf of the perpetrator, in an attempt to not leave DNA residue.
2. While this could be plausible, I interpret their relationship to be one that was a partnership, working so well for them that it lead them into their 70's. It seems to me that they were planning the next stage of their life, together, with the building of their new home. I do respect however, that we never truly know the inner workings of a relationship, and divorce can occur for a plethora of reasons and at any age. But this is just the impression I get.
3. While also plausible, this home was in the works for quite a while. Why now would BS have an issue with the plans, with the cost, with anything? I don't see anything being news to BS in this meeting, but that's just my opinion.
In all three of these scenarios, the ligature still throws me off for the reason stated previously. When considering a murder-suicide, the only place my brain goes is to some dark or disturbed psychological episode on behalf of BS. I can't truly pinpoint any other cause or reason or event for this to have occurred. Was BS historically violent or abusive (physically or emotionally) within the family? I respect that we really don't know one way or the other.
Finally, I remain of the fence due to the little known facts we really have. All we can do is speculate from one side or the fence or the other, and I still see many possibilities as to why someone may feel deeply wronged by the Sherman's, or BS specifically.