This the post where the " interim" housing was first mentioned, iirc...
ETA thinking they meant " Foresthill"
Canada - Barry, 75, & Honey Sherman, 70, found dead, Toronto, 15 Dec 2017 #1
"Friends say the couple was having
a new home built closer to downtown Toronto.Very chaotic so they purchased a home last year in Forest Ridge,18 days ago they put their residence since 1985 for sale and in addition they are building a new home near downtown Toronto"
Also this link posted by Matou including video
Canada - Barry, 75, & Honey Sherman, 70, found dead, Toronto, 15 Dec 2017 #1
" Neighbours interviewed by CP24 reporters stated that the couple was moving into a condo."
@3:10 in the video at link https://www.cp24.com/news/pharma-gi...-barry-and-honey-sherman-found-dead-1.3723714
Okay thank you for that link dotr. So the reporter said that 2 of the Sherman neighbours had mentioned that the couple were to move into a condo.. so we are left with not really knowing whether the neighbours actually knew this info, or they were just repeating rumor, or they got the info they *did* have, mixed up, or whatever.
It seems like that news article quoted is messed up, in that it speaks of having purchased a home in 'Forest Ridge' (which I don't believe we have heard anything about at all and was, as dotr mentioned, likely an error to mean 'Forest Hill'?), while at same time, saying the couple were building a new home closer to downtown.
From that quoted piece, I am wondering if whomever gave media that information, was confused and actually speaking of the same property without realizing it - ie perhaps knowing the couple was building a new home closer to downtown, AND also knowing the couple had already purchased a property in Forest Hill, but not realizing that both of those descriptions were in fact the same property - that being the one they had already purchased in Forest Hill and had also already starting to build on?
When they bought the new property it had a house on it, and sometimes when people hear that someone is building, they might *assume* that it is taking place on an empty building lot, as opposed to on a lot where a home already exists?
Also that news does not mention 'condo', so personally I am wondering on the validity of any of that talk of moving into an interim place. There was no need, why have 3 places? There would only be a need in the event their current home sold and closed prior to their new home being completed. I can imagine that Honey, perhaps in talking to various neighbours within the past few weeks, may have mentioned that if the current home ended up selling first, they would simply get a condo. Etc...
In any case it wasn't said that the couple HAD already moved anywhere else, including to a condo. Secondly, Gomes during her press conference, I believe said that TPS had searched 2 residences, those being obviously the one in which they were found dead, and the other being the property the couple owned in Florida.
The timing of the killings does seem incredibly coincidental - having only put their home for sale 2.5 weeks prior, and also planning to leave their home for a month in only a few days. For someone with a serious axe to grind, who may have had a very good idea of the layout of the house and all of its rooms, etc. (they were posted online I believe?), that may have meant a rather narrow window of opportunity.
All jmo.