CJ is known to have stepped off her school bus, in front of her home between 3:45 and 3:50 pm on 3 October 1984.
No other family member was home.
Her schoolbag was found inside the home, along with the mail and newspapers which was CJ's job to bring inside everyday.
The recorder she received at school that day was found with her remains 3 months later.
Her bike was in the shed attached to the home where she normally left it, on it's side which is not how she normally left it. A jacket she may have worn to school that day was hinging on a peg too high for her to reach.
No one saw CJ travel to the corner store that day, with or without her bike, due south from her home and .7 km away. The store owner gave sworn testimony that CJ did in fact visit the store that day, a daily or almost daily routine.
CJ's mother claims she also went to the store that day, how much of a routine that was is not available, however the store owner disputed that and claimed she did not.
The store closed b4 she went there. Her testitmony at both trials states that. He never hinted at her lying, just stated he never saw her. Read the time she went out searching.
A male passenger in a car later claimed to have seen a young girl matching CJ's description standing outside the store that day talking to other children and holding a recorder like the one she received at school that day.
Read his statement.. She was alone...
A couple claimed a few days later to have seen a child being held down in a car at the same intersection where the store is located when they came to a stop at that intersection - they never said it was CJ. The couple claims to have followed the car into a small subdivision and lost sight of it.
It is now known that the precise corner at this intersection and direction of travel of this sighting is incorrect in the KR. What this couple said and where this vehicle was coming from is confusing.
The actual police and court statements state they saw the car turning right on ravenshoe from leslie. Featured many times by the defense. I never said that they identified Christine.. They saw a man fighting with a child... They never followed the car.. Nowhere in any document does it say this
No one saw CJ travel back home from the store that day, with or without her bike.
She was seen, and it was testified too... Thats why the liar never testified to seeing her on the corner
The veracity of the sightings of CJ standing outside the store, in the store or being held down in a vehicle have never been substantiated or backed up with any other evidence - they are strictly the word of the person giving the statement.
I believe Chris the storekeeper... There were people who saw her riding home. They weren't in the book because the defence agreed to the statement of facts.... She did go to the store, and rode her bike home. Atkinson was never called to testify by the defence because everyting he said was a lie.
There are no other reports regarding that day that can be found
There are hundreds of reports. You just haven't looked. The book was slanted to free an innocent man. I am glad it did, but so much was rumor and stories told to the author that the defence could and or didn't want in court.
The latest news update on this case (Sept 2012) omits the male passenger sighting and the couple in the car seeing a child being held down. The report only claims that she went to the store that day (unseen), without her bike (which would take longer), was abducted from the park across the street from the store (unseen) and driven 50 kms away where she was found on 31 Dec 1984.
The same report has the abductor leaving the park and pulling up to the busy intersection of Leslie St and Queensville SR where they have to stop and wait for any traffic to clear (unseen and unreported), rather than turning east on Queensville SR where there would be no need to stop.
What report is this? Because you have never mentioned b4... This is pure fiction. Because even the defense agreed she was taken from home.... I know you are lying here as NO report has her taken from anywhere but home. What report?
So far, there has been no value or contribution to what may have really happened to CJ by going over the wrongful conviction of 1992 and the exoneration of 1995. While it is good to know that story, raking it up seems to keep the case from progressing beyond CJ gathering up the family mail and newspaper(s) on 3 October 1984.
Everything is to be gained, it is the start of the truth coming out.... You spend so long battling over the minutia of the day based on the books account.. Now say it doesn't matter... Even in this post you go on about your facts of the day.... What the ****.....
It would be great to see fresh ideas.