Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the tweet is different from what came out of the RCMP mouths at the announcement is what is causing the conflict.
they spoke in deep brush and tweeted near the shore.
"..or want to talk about".That would suggest that there is no computer evidence, such as a note or manifesto, of a motive, or at least not one that the police have found yet or want to talk about.
That strikes me as an odd bit of phrasing--"speak of politics." I can't imagine a creepier invitation. LOL
No worries! I watched that sequence and found the screenshot of BS's FB message a bit odd. Asking him if he "wanted to hang out this weekend and speak of politics." That strikes me as an odd bit of phrasing--"speak of politics." I can't imagine a creepier invitation. LOL
It's like it was written by an AI trying and failing to pass the Turing test.
I had a good laugh at both your responses!No kidding...I'd be like, "um, I have to wash my hair."
Exactly! As a a Canadian, I do not expect to be entitled to know the details of any police investigation. No matter how publicizedcor costly. Spend what you need to keep us as safe as humanly possible. MOO-taxpaying CanadianIf only that’s how it worked. There is a lot of things you and I pay taxes towards but will never know.
just saying both are words from the RCMP. not words modified by reporters. I agree both can be correct.the deep brush IS near the shore. both of their statements are correct.
Curious... you said you visited Gillam, and specifically the RAV4 burn site. You use American spelling. You said you talked to people "on both sides". You've also claimed that you spoke with a local who (wrongly) said the RCMP found the bodies a day earlier than they did. What, generally, was the purpose of your alleged trip to Gillam and the remote burn site for? And what are the "sides"?If only that’s how it worked. There is a lot of things you and I pay taxes towards but will never know.
I meant was the jet boat operator (Clint Sawchuk) doing some amateur sleuthing. I can't imagine he was taking passengers in the boat as I imagine tourism has been way down in the area the past few weeks.
Exactly! As a a Canadian, I do not expect to be entitled to know the details of any police investigation. No matter how publicizedcor costly. Spend what you need to keep us as safe as humanly possible. MOO-taxpaying Canadian
One thing that has come through loud and clear is that the RCMP, as an enforcement agency, doesn’t leak like a sieve, or indeed at all. There are some countries where probable cause of death etc, etc would be all over cable news by now. Apparently RCMP members, from constable on up, don’t think that they’re part of a reality TV show.
The two cannot be convicted posthumously and after the death of a suspect, any outstanding charges are withdrawn because there cannot ever be an arrest or criminal trial.
Curious... you said you visited Gillam, and specifically the RAV4 burn site. You use American spelling. You said you talked to people "on both sides". You've also claimed that you spoke with a local who (wrongly) said the RCMP found the bodies a day earlier than they did. What, generally, was the purpose of your alleged trip to Gillam and the remote burn site for? And what are the "sides"?
Three murders. And it's none.What assurance will the public have that the police have solved the 2 murders?
What would be the point of laying charges against 2 dead men? Won't whatever evidence has been uncovered suffice to name them as the people responsible for the 3 murders?
I'm just trying to understand the importance of laying charges as, obviously, there will be no trial.
Maybe he was reading political stuff from the Nazi era and that was influencing him - stuff written 80-100 years ago. I can imagine writers of that time period "spoke of politics" to each other. Archaic and yeah, totally creepy.No worries! I watched that sequence and found the screenshot of BS's FB message a bit odd. Asking him if he "wanted to hang out this weekend and speak of politics." That strikes me as an odd bit of phrasing--"speak of politics." I can't imagine a creepier invitation. LOL
"We still need to ensure that our investigative findings… eliminates any other possibilities or suspects," said Hackett.There is no point in laying charges. But how will we know that the police have solved the murders, or just claim they have?