NJSleuth91
Former Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2019
- Messages
- 1,227
- Reaction score
- 7,126
Oh I know! My post wasn't directed to your comment, it was more meant in regards to AL looking for all the reasonings possible which I find sad but also normal for him to try to rationalize being a parent.
He's also said he wants to prevent this type of thing from happening again. And I think there is something to be said for the overall environment contributing to development.
Crimes stats are kinda weird I find. I think Victoria was dubbed a dangerous city too somewhere. There is high petty theft here and probably in PA because of the drug addicts. So high numbers for crime.
Then you go to Vancouver and there's more gangs and 'big' violent crime. Pick your poison! I lived in Vancouver and no crime experiences, moved to Victoria and had license plates stolen off my car, two bikes stolen, window smashed on car to break in which I found odd and annoying.
Well in that article it also said Port Alberni was 7th in Canada for violent crime. I don't think it actually has the highest murder rate in Canada as Bryer's dad claimed, but it's definitely up there.
But I also wonder what the Canadian definition of "high crime rates" is vs. the US definition. Like my husband grew up in Jersey City in the 80s and 90s, so our definition of "high crime rates" is "accidentally walking into a gunfight between rival gangs while walking down the street," "family car is stolen, presumably by crackheads, but it's such a terrible car that they return it three days later," and "wow, turns out Ramzi Yousef and his buddies were living a few blocks away!"
Lots of transient people from all over Canada flock to the island because we have mild winters, so easy to 'live on the street' here. That creates volume on the mental health/healthcare system here as well (although the problem is Canada wide, it doesn't help having a high transient population).
Yeah there's the same problem in the Pacific Northwest in the US, also. Seattle and Portland actually have much higher crime rates than people would think.
It sounds like Bryer and Kam didn't have a ton of interests or ambitions. They droned out on screens/video games and isolated themselves with each other. They were surrounded by beautiful scenery, hiking and an outdoorsy lifestyle. They could've started a rock band in PA, went to Tofino to surf, Port Renfrew to fish, the big city of Victoria to go to University or meet new people or done many things if compelled to. It's too bad they couldn't or chose to not see a brighter future for themselves.
Technically they did seem to spend a lot of time outdoors, especially with their Airsoft and survivalist stuff. Kam's family was outdoorsy, Bryer's great-uncle said Bryer was into hiking as well, and they were described as going camping in that article with the Nazi Ritalin thing (which sounds like something they did regularly).
But you know how they say "wherever you go, there you are"?
Two potential murderers and two victims always involves complexity because the Crown is required to prove beyond reasonable doubt who specifically murdered who. Clearly both K&B did not both murder L, and both did not murder C if two guns were involved but each victim incurred fatal gunshot wounds from only one of the two guns involved.
Therefore I disagree charges were ready to be filed in the murders of L&C. With two defendants, if reasonable doubt is created over who caused the murder of which victim, there’s high risk both defendants will be found Not Guilty of both murders.
They were both charged with Professor Dyck's murder on July 23rd even though there was only one gunshot wound which was the cause of death. So clearly confusion over which one of them shot whom isn't the reason why they weren't charged in Lucas and Chynna's deaths.