Taken from post #107
""Beige colour bedding, including a fitted sheet and a comforter, were among items taken from the home, police said Friday as they described the grisly scene"
I wonder what other items he had taken from the home. We do know that he did not take her computers. Obviously he took her car keys.
I do not think they have a POI or they would have found a way to get DNA, such as in the trash or at his job. Even Drew Planten who tried to keep his DNA away from LE after Stephanie Bennett's murder was foiled by a persistent LE.
The discarded bedding really confuses me. If there were traces of DNA from Sonias' killer, wouldn't the person want to destroy it & not just randomly discard it for anyone to find? Why remove Sonia from her home at all?
It might have been easier to roll her up in the sheet she was laying on, the fitted sheet. Also getting rid of any DNA by tossing bedding somewhere else not with her body. But the killer wasn't thinking clearly, because the bedding was found. Anyone who finds bloody bedding is going to report it or suspect a murder.
Maybe they thought no one would find the bedding or at least not think it was related to the crime scene since it wasn't with her body. Signs of a tired killer making sloppy mistakes.
The "probable cause" would be the positive DNA test from the discarded item. A detective would write up the facts: such as "LE watched the suspect toss the cigarette". The cigarette then was taken to the lab, the results were a match to the crime scene DNA of the possible killer. Then the court/judge says "yes" there is "probable cause" to obtain a sample of that person's DNA. Then they issue a warrant to allow LE to force the possible killer give a sample for DNA.
Might that suggest perp could be physically similar to the witnesses?
Would dna reveal that kind of information?
imo, speculation.