TURBOTHINK
Former Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2008
- Messages
- 5,492
- Reaction score
- 7
Didn't he say 5 days, not weeks?
I am not sure..........I remember the 5 - will have to go back and read it again.
Didn't he say 5 days, not weeks?
Yes, this is also true and researched. Green Team and I disagreed on this and once I did the research to find out the answer (Because I swore there were two dogs that smelled the trunk), the bond hearing and every other 'official' piece of info that I could find on it said ONE. Only the media kept saying DOGS. That's where the misinformation comes from.
No, why would the judge revoke her bail? Her additional charges are minor, so to speak. Now if LE decides to charge her with murder, then perhaps the Judge would say "no bail"
You have to remember the original charges are not a biggie. Bail might have been $15,000.00, instead of $500,200.00.
The only time "perhaps" the Judge might do a gag order is when the trial begins, but this upcoming trial is on the child neglect and Obstruction or whatever the heck it is.
What are you getting at? Got my curiousity peaked.
If TES is working with LE that clears it up for me. Also, the idea that it is high profile and there is no family cooperation also makes sense as well. Just overall it's been bugging me that of all the *gin joints* to pick this one has had me scratching my head. I'm all for it because I want Caylee found. It's for the good of the investigation because if they find her it's one step closer to CA being locked away forever, and it's good for the organization as a whole because it will heighten their profile and they do great work.
Let's face it, Cindy called them under pressure and I believe she was disengenuous when she did finally make the call. I just think of all the worthy lower profile families who are suffering greatly with no attention put on their plight.
Thanks for your responses. I'm new here.
I saw that..........but not all Sunfires had the small spare. You could order the full size spare and that would make for a different size compartment. There is also the question if she had the hatch cover..........that would cover the entire lower back of the car.
One of the women I work with asked me why there was so much attention to this case when there were so many other families with missing children? I said: because those missing children have families that are looking for them. Caylee's family is not.
Didn't he say 5 days, not weeks?
One of the women I work with asked me why there was so much attention to this case when there were so many other families with missing children? I said: because those missing children have families that are looking for them. Caylee's family is not.
Sorry- now I'm confused. What was "inconsistent" about the dog? What does that mean?
Did both dogs smell the yard and the car but only one hit on the car? Also, in reference to the car- was it the backseat ever or just the trunk?
Anything is possible..........and I do remember them saying they gave Lee's car to Casey...........but since she never had a driver's license how could they do that?
That would be child endangerment letting Casey drive around in their car with no license and Caylee.
Do you at least have a general idea where this info came from, like an interview with someone, or the documents. I have been looking for outside verification, other than Cindy, that the purse was even left in the car for over a week now, and am coming up empty.
Thanks if you can help.
Lanie
I agree that is very interesting. But first I think the pontiac was a 1998 (not 99). Plus - ok so this tow lot and used car dealer has all this going on and OCS was poss involved how would that play into all this - just say for arguments sake this was the car.Old but interesting
http://www.bizjournals.com/orlando/stories/2000/04/03/story4.html