Facts are actually determined by evidence gathered, statements made, records pulled along with testimony provided, etc. Each and everyone is a fact, until it enters into the Judicial Prudence and is then debated over the elimination of the evidence of fact gathering through legal wrangling.
To say what LE has obtained in the way of recordings, findings, affidavits and evidence, as not being a fact would cause law enforcement and the entire judicial system, to go belly up. It would leave no room for the attorneys to argue their case and represent their clients, there would be no cases entered into trial.
To dismiss what LE has thus far collected as not being fact is akin to saying LE is lying. The evidence in and of itself is fact, until the time comes for all the legal arguments within a court of law.
Emotions may appear to jump up and down in a court of law but the evidence of fact is what makes the case, not emotions. All though that angle as we know, is often utilized on a jury. Bottom line, will the evidence of fact collected on both sides stand up in court? It all depends and that's a fact. :Justice: