Here are my thoughts on and understanding of the 'missing tool' J35 mentioned:
A tool was missing from LW's parent's house. It matched wounds on Jane's body.
I have hundreds of tools around my house. The only way to determine if something was missing would be 1.) if it was a very specific tool that you only had one of, or 2.) it was part of a 'set' of some kind. I wonder how police knew the tool was missing?
If the tool is missing, how could police match it to Jane's wounds? So what if Jane had a shovel-shaped wound and LW is missing a shovel (just an example)? That isn't a match, just a similarity. You'd have to have a very rare tool or be able compare the tool marks (from the die or from another object the tool was known to have left marks on).
Jane was exposed for almost two months. The tool would have had to have left a print on her bone to get any detail (must likely, obviously I don't know the details).
What kind of tool would be missed and would leave discernible marks after two months?
(It is the nature of the forums to discuss victims and the last moments of their lives objectively. I do remember the girls and their families each time I post (as I'm sure most other posters do)).
I firstly would like to know where the information regarding the 'missing tool' was obtained. I have read nothing about this in any newspaper report or anywhere else for that matter.
The Andrew Mallard stitch up is an interesting case. The government's pathologist in that case made some assumptions that proved to be totally incorrect or even false in the first place.
A 'tool' could be anything, literally and the 'tool' may not be related to marks on a body, but on foliage at both disposal sites.
Neither JR nor CG were buried either partially or fully; they both were covered by
cut foliage which possibly may have preserved evidence given that many Australian native plants shed water from their leaves. The leaves have what appears to be a wax-type coating.
Is the 'missing' tool a garden implement ? I also read recently that JR was found face down; could this tell us that the upholstery evidence found in the 55 tape strips was from her back area or possibly under her fingernails or hair.
Re the upholstery evidence being linked to a VS Commodore Series 1. Given the detail published by Bret that the particular upholstery fibres matched upholstery that was only used in the Series 1 model, could the vehicle have been an upmarket vehicle and branded as a Calais or Berlina (documents online detail both these 'brands' as being Holden Commodore VS Series 1 models). All the information out there about the VS Series 1 states this model mainly upgraded mechanical components so to me it would be highly unusual for Holden to put money into special upholstery unless it was to be used in an upmarket model of the same model and series marketed under a different brand name.
Police were also stating in 2008 that there were witness sightings of CG after the sighting of her talking to someone in the station wagon. Could the station wagon driver have offered the lift, then CG said she was ok, kept walking and another driver has stopped; and he was driving a Calais or Berlina ?