RANCH
United we stand, divided we fall.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 18,247
- Reaction score
- 38,839
I'm not understanding the point you're trying to make.But these was an initial POSITIVE in his first test---and it was a reaction to rust...
I'm not understanding the point you're trying to make.But these was an initial POSITIVE in his first test---and it was a reaction to rust...
The point I am making is that Molly cannot do further forensic testing---she can o9nly do initial alerts.I'm not understanding the point you're trying to make.
An HRD dog is only supposed to do a trained final response on the scent of decomposing human remains. Rust is not human remains so an HRD dog that alerts to that would be giving a false positive. JMOThe point I am making is that Molly cannot do further forensic testing---she can o9nly do initial alerts.
She alerted on something and when the forensics guy tested, it was POSITIVE for blood at first test...but it was because of excess RUST, which mimics blood because of the iron
So my point is that Molly was alerting because it smelled like blood and it took further testing to see the difference
The cross examination made the point better than I did. There was 'corroboration' because there were hairs and a fingernail in the areas Molly alerted.I'm not understanding the point you're trying to make.
Right, it was a mistake but not surprising, as even the original test by the investigator came up as a false positive. So Molly did just as well as forensic examiner's first test on that area.An HRD dog is only supposed to do a trained final response on the scent of decomposing human remains. Rust is not human remains so an HRD dog that alerts to that would be giving a false positive. JMO
Thanks. Both of those items could have been left there by a living person. Again the alerts do not provide evidence of a dead Dylan Redwine. JMOThe cross examination made the point better than I did. There was 'corroboration' because there were hairs and a fingernail in the areas Molly alerted.
lolYour Honor can you please instruct Mr. Moran to use the microphone?!
That’s a quote from me.
Of course. Which is why they do further testing.Thanks. Both of those items could have been left there by a living person. Again the alerts do not provide evidence of a dead Dylan Redwine. JMO
I guess I'm not making my point clear and it's not fair for everyone if I keep trying. I'm moving on from this.Of course. Which is why they do further testing.
HRD Dogs only point out areas for FURTHER TESTING. So Molly did her job.
I think you are over estimating what the purpose of HRD dogs are. They cannot do extensive testing themselves. They merely point out specific areas that need further examination.There was no corroboration. That means the dog alert wasn't verified by scientific means. JMO