BBM that wording catches my eye every time!
Trying to text him!
Originally Posted by aust amateur slueth
R: So you went to run errands. Were you going to take him with you to run errands?
M: Well, there was
some discussion he had with me the night before about leaving with me so I could drop him off in the Bayfield are with one of his friends that had
been trying to text him or that
he had been communicating with. As
he had indicated to me he had been up until 4 o'clock in the morning the night before, he was tired from being in the airport most of the day in his travel from Colorado Springs to Durango. I laughed at him kind of jokingly because I know him. If he ain't got to get up, he's not likely to get up. And he's not the type of kid who's going to get up at 6:30 if he doesn't have to. But you know, his friends are important and I know they're important me. So there was a possibility but it doesn't surprise me he elected to not get up when I left. And when I left,
he acknowledged everything I was saying to him and that I would be back. He knew when I came back that I would be
working on getting him down to his friends. And that's
part of the struggle we all have, you know, what happened to him between the time I left and when I got back. And
that's what nobody seems to be able to answer.
All very vague language IMO.... and even though I think the word
"with" is weird in the following sentence, this is a direct statement: "Dylan, my prayers are with you and I love you very much". That was direct and then this one: "I sent him text messages" That was direct, not vague at all - that is why I believe that he knows how to speak normally and only speaks vaguely when he is lying. IMO