RANCH
United we stand, divided we fall.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 18,071
- Reaction score
- 37,765
I respectfully have to disagree with the 'no need'. MR told the public on DP he failed his first poly or it was inconclusive. MR then followed with stating that there was a problem with the polygraph examiner (sorry not verbatim). Why would MR even mention the polygraph examiner problem if he wasn't concerned with the accuracy of the results? Truth or an excuse, either way this issue alone would be a logical reason to take the poly offered by DP. There was a need to correct the alleged problem with the original polygraph examiner.
In my opinion Mark should have never gone on the Dr Phil show in the first place. He would not have had to try to explain why LE told him that he failed a polygraph.
Why didn't Dr Phil explain to Mark that LE could have lied to him about the results? I think that the reason Dr Phil didn't is because it makes for better TV to have all of the drama of giving Mark a polygraph on his show.
I think that Mark made a least two mistakes in regard to the Dr Phil show. First one was agreeing to go on the show and the second one was agreeing to do the polygraph.
MOO.