CO- Dylan Redwine's case discussed on Dr. Phil ONLY!- 2/26/13 ***SPOILERS***

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought ER appeared foolish in accusing MR of putting a dead rat in her truck. Not the time or place. In addition, IMO, it makes it appear she has a history of accusing him of things he didn't do.
 
Well, the mail lady is still insisting she saw Dylan, so whether it's "confirmed" or not, she believes it. Even as of last week when the show was taped. IMO

The important part is that LE has discounted it. They must have good reason to do so. They would have jumped all over it, to find out who the other boy was if it were credible.

There was an msm article posted upthread explaining about the 2 boys that were seen around town, one originally MISTAKEN for Dylan. Apparently this boy looks a lot like Dylan and recently moved to Vallecito. And he came forward already saying he was at the Village market and the Mexican Restaurant, where the sightings were.
 
Well, the mail lady is still insisting she saw Dylan, so whether it's "confirmed" or not, she believes it. Even as of last week when the show was taped. IMO

I know there is still one sighting of Dylan that has not been cleared. Salem even posted about it a while back.
 
I thought ER appeared foolish in accusing MR of putting a dead rat in her truck. Not the time or place. In addition, IMO, it makes it appear she has a history of accusing him of things he didn't do.

Why isn't it the time or place? She is showing a pattern of his abusive twisted behavior.

And how do we know he didn't do it? I lean towards GUILT.
 
The thing is, there are a lot of accusations that BOTH parents throw things back and forth and continue all the drama and fighting...but with the exception of the dead rat, I didn't see ER accuse MR of anything except losing her child and asking him (repeatedly) "Where is Dylan" "What have you done with him" and "Did you hurt Dylan"...all of that is NORMAL and should be expected and understood. She did not bring up irrelevant, useless information in an effort to throw digs at MR. Not one word about his personal "issues". When he talks about Dylan not having a coat, it would have been easy to sidetrack and throw it back in his face, (Why didn't you buy him a coat?) Nothing about the cause of their divorce. Nothing about HIS friends, HIS drunken sexcapades on the lawn, nothing about HIS legal issues for non-payment of bills, etc. etc. I'm sure her list could be long, but NOTHING from her except her fears about Dylan. For Elaine this was about her child. For MR, this was about HIM. That's my opinion and I am entitled.
 
Re: Nickelodeon. I didn't know until just a few years ago there was more than one channel of it. I found out when I was at a family party and went in the house it sit down. All the teenagers were watching Nickelodeon. I asked then what they were watching, it was a teen show. That's when they told me about Teen Nick. To me, it's all the same. If my grandchildren came here and watched Teen Nick, I would just think they are watching Nickelodeon. No biggie, to adults, it's all Nickelodeon. IMO. I can honestly see him saying Nickelodeon to start with and then asked which one he says one of them, and then later incorporates that into his story of what happend that day to clarify. IMO.
 
ER How could you do this to him? MR does NOT say I didnt do anything to him !

OK TY MR '' No i didnt hurt him' ........finally

"hurt" or"harm" are words the parent often uses to minimize what they have done to their child.
 
Why isn't it the time or place? She is showing a pattern of his abusive twisted behavior.

And how do we know he didn't do it? I lean towards GUILT.

Different people have different impressions of the show. I personally did not believe ER when she said she called MR.
 
imamaze
WS Super Moderator

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 15,081
Blog Entries: 10
Here are various articles talking about sightings of Dylan
11/28/12 “There’s a combination of factors,” Bender said. “There’s been the passage of time without any sightings; Dylan was not a visitor but had friends here; he has a history of staying in contact with his family and friends; and there’s been nothing on his cellphone record since he was reported missing.” http://www.durangoherald.com/article....CwvEVNRs.dpuf
12/02/12 Several possible sightings of Dylan were reported early on, but those have been discounted.
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_22...#ixzz2M303Ffc6

12/05/12 There have been no confirmed sightings of the 13-year-old boy since his disappearance.
http://www.durangoherald.com/article....EGqi2XSu.dpuf

12/06/12 There have been no confirmed sightings of him since. http://durangoherald.com/article/201....7FYtUR4p.dpuf

1/31/13 Dylan Redwine Task Force investigators said they searched miles of countryside and interviewed hundreds of people, but developments in the case have now dwindled. They have no named suspects and no confirmed sightings of Dylan. http://www.durangoherald.com/article...-Dylan-Redwine#

2/03/13 “We have no new leads or new information to report to the public at this time,” Shupe said in a news release Monday afternoon.

Possible sightings of Dylan have streamed in from across the country, he said, but there have been no confirmed sightings since he went missing Nov. 19. The FBI has been helpful at prodding agencies in other jurisdictions to follow up on possible leads, Shupe said.

http://durangoherald.com/article/201....GR63IKRE.dpuf

2/07/13 There have been no confirmed sightings of Dylan since he went missing.
http://www.9news.com/dontmiss/315231...dwine-turns-14-

2/07/13 Law enforcement officials have received sighting reports from throughout the country. Those tips haven’t yielded any results yet, however. http://catalystnewspaper.com/2012/12...han-two-weeks/
__________________

I wonder how many times LE can advise people there were no confirmed sightings of Dylan? No confirmed sightings means exactly that. NO CONFIRMED SIGHTINGS. The mail lady sighting was not confirmed. She may believe she saw something, but clearly LE doesn't believe she saw what she thinks she saw.
And I tend to roll with LE. I'm pretty sure they know what they are doing. :seeya:
 
I wonder how many times LE can advise people there were no confirmed sightings of Dylan? No confirmed sightings means exactly that. NO CONFIRMED SIGHTINGS. The mail lady sighting was not confirmed. She may believe she saw something, but clearly LE doesn't believe she saw what she thinks she saw.
And I tend to roll with LE. I'm pretty sure they know what they are doing. :seeya:

Thank you for your opinion. I will not be going back through every posting in every thread and every MSM article to verify, which is what would be required for accuracy.
 
Ok I am finally watching the show now - thanks for linking me up. :great:

Am just going to comment as I go along here. First thing of note is that ER got to sit on stage chatting with EP uninterrupted and DP states he hasn't met MR.
Once MR is on stage, there is barely a couple of minutes before he is interrupted by ER. I understand why she is upset and all she says to him - but IMO this would rattle anyone who had just stepped onto the stage.
 
Maybe because they created this child together, so it's hard for him to believe that after being married to a man for 18 years and having two children by him, how could she believe he would harm his own son??
It's not that odd to me that he put it that way... maybe not the exact words I would choose but still, not unbelievable, IMO.

He didn't say I can't believe you could think I would do that! He said WHAT KIND OF MOTHER ARE YOU?

what kind of mother are you to even think that I was capable of doing something like that?

What does that have anything to do with what kind of mother she is? SHE'S NOT HIS MOTHER!!

I must be crazy if this is a logical statement. I give up.
 
I'm still trying to figure out why Dr Phil allowed the postal carrier on the show at all. LE has said that there have been no confirmed sightings of Dylan so why would he bring her on the show to muddy the waters?

Someone said that Dr Phil was trying to "balance" the show by doing this. I can understand being fair, but bringing someone on the show that LE has not confirmed as being correct doesn't make sense to me.

I thought that Dr Phil was only interested in the truth. How does this unconfirmed sighting get us to the truth?
 
Have no idea if they are still saying that.

They were saying that on Feb 7th. And that sighting came in back at the very start of the case. And the two boys with backpacks, seen in various places around town, have been confirmed already as mistaken identity. So I think the mail carrier was incorrect.

If there was anything to this sighting, then why was Mark accusing Elaine of taking Dylan? Doesn't he have faith in this mail carriers sighting?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
75
Guests online
191
Total visitors
266

Forum statistics

Threads
608,899
Messages
18,247,408
Members
234,495
Latest member
Indy786
Back
Top