My post expressed admiration for
@perception=reality's courage and my regard for this forum. Plus I supported his effort by offering another example of similar crimes, even though I disagreed with acid theory. Nothing more, and nothing less!
And further,
@squareandrabbet , I agree with you completely, theories should be based on fact, and not hollywood movie scripts. But the OP of the acid theory based it on the fact that Gannon was presumed dead, and a nearby Lowes. Missing piece was evidence of an acid purchase.
Now others posted theories with dog sweaters, harnesses, and weights. And the only facts were TS's statements during a phone interview. I don't recall any strongly opposing posts on those theories.
My position on the matter is that I am not in a position to discount anyone's theory until I am aware of the evidence.
I enjoy reading the theories and learning from all of the members in this forum. U2
I stand firmly on the side of fairness, consistency and respect, that's all
.