jillycat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 2,746
- Reaction score
- 11,841
That’s censorship, and the government, in this case LE, has no authority to approve or not approve media content. The press can’t be muzzled. Even in the case of the release of the neighbor’s video, LE said they want to be the source of credible info because future justice pursuits could be compromised by releases of potential evidence, but they left it at that.I believe LE is being very shrewd and calculating in all of this. If the interview actually took place Monday I am sure that the news agency showed LE the interview prior to putting it out there...thus, the organized search. LE took that interview information, compared it to other information they've received/found and gave the news outlet the "go ahead" to publish once LE had their plan in place.
LE is very careful in what they themselves release, and they’re keeping this case close to the vest, but that doesn’t include monitoring the 1A freedoms of the media or the big mouth of LS. If anything what she says is a gift to them.