Maisiebelle
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
- Messages
- 4,031
- Reaction score
- 22
As I understand it if we move to phase three victim impact statements which could be lengthy...I guess James Holmes can have those statements too but really wonder what more his family can say and how many would really get up...usually those questions of 'do you still care" and "would you visit" are asked during phase 3 but the defense did that in phase 2. Then I believe it is the jury that ultimately recommends life or death and that is the point where I think and history shows it is very very hard even after a trial like this for all 12 to agree....they say in voir dire they can do it but when actually faced with it...well many have just not done it. I think this could end with lwop.
I think the defence wanted to make sure the jury didn't get to hear victim impact statements. They have tried desperately to make the jury feel sympathy for the shooter. They don't want the jury to hear how devastated the victims are and how they suffer to this day.
Every time the evidence went in this direction during the guilt phase the defence leapt to their feet to stop them. Now the victims have a chance to say how they felt/feel and the defence wants to avoid that at all costs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk