Isn't that where it all came unstuck in the Arias trial? Or did they mix her mitigating/sentence?
arias jurors agreed she had no mitagators, so they went on to the DP/sentencing phase-that is where they couldn't agree.
Thank you.
I thought the first one some of them mentioned her age (the foreman?) or some such which is why it was a mistrial.
Anyway, on with this one.
A journalist has posted information about the jury foreman (a man) online and got into serious trouble with the judge.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A journalist has posted information about the jury foreman (a man) online and got into serious trouble with the judge.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I meant for the Arias trial. I already knew the name of the foreman before it was posted, although I didn't know he was the foreman until all silly Newsweek posted about him.
Guesses??? I'm thinking either they feel the mental illness is a strong mitigator or they don't count it as a mitigator at all. If they continue on to phase 3, not seeing mental illness as a mitigator, he really may get the dp. Opinions??
HELP...can someone give me the link to a live link. I lost all of my links to the court room! Thank you!
Guesses??? I'm thinking either they feel the mental illness is a strong mitigator or they don't count it as a mitigator at all. If they continue on to phase 3, not seeing mental illness as a mitigator, he really may get the dp. Opinions??
Well, since they rejected the insanity in the guilty trial & that was the capacity to determine between right & wrong, and the mitigation, by law states it is the capacity- NOT if a person has a mental disease, we might be going on to Phase 3, IMO.