I listened to closing arguments while at work today.
i thought that the prosecution's was somewhat weak. I expected something a bit more compelling. It was good, but not memorable for me. I like the PT opening better. Maybe GB was just tired after such a long trial.
I was surprised by reaction to the defense closing. I tuned out the issues with her voice and when she raised it to make a point. I tried to listen to her actual line of thinking and argument, and I do feel she made some good points. I thought her arguments as to why jurors should choose LWOP were sound.
One of the best parts of her argument, to me, was when she talked about mercy having nothing to do with JH earning it or deserving it, that mercy is something bestowed upon someone by another person (or words to that effect). I hadn't thought about it in that way, but it made a lot of sense to me.
Like I said, I didn't expect to have that reaction, so it surprised me. I felt more swayed by her closing than the PT's.
And all the way through, I have not really cared whether he would get DP or LWOP because I just don't think there is much difference between them aside from some technicalities. I am opposed to the death penalty now, but years ago I was in support of it. I also realize that I have not lost a loved one in a violent manner, so its possible that my feelings would change if I were in those shoes.
I do think they will come back with a verdict tomorrow, and I won't be surprised if they do give him the DP.