HarvestMoon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2005
- Messages
- 3,120
- Reaction score
- 1,240
I hope LE finds this horrible monster quickly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You said that LE might have told the media to "back off" so the killer gets annoyed that he isn't getting attention, and he does a "look at me" move. We are talking about someone who has already murdered a little girl. There's a possibility that a "look at me" move could involve another child. Like, "Do I have to kill two kids for you to pay attention?"
http://www.dailycamera.com/cu-news/...ering-center-evacuated-over-unidentified-odor
I need to get my mind on something else for a little while. When I saw this news story on the local news tonight, my mind went to a bad place. For those not in the local area, Boulder is straight west from Superior. Did any other Colorado people do this too or am I completely losing it?
Have a good night everyone.
You said that LE might have told the media to "back off" so the killer gets annoyed that he isn't getting attention, and he does a "look at me" move. We are talking about someone who has already murdered a little girl. There's a possibility that a "look at me" move could involve another child. Like, "Do I have to kill two kids for you to pay attention?"
Police have only said that the body was "not intact". There is no information regarding why the body was not intact (deliberate mutilation, or animal activity). Talking heads have used more graphic and misleading terms - but there is no information to support the terms used by the talking heads in the media.
Omgosh, what if they are working together?
Maybe it is about ease of removal and disposal maybe it's not.. I do know that to dismember a human body(even that of a child) is in no way whatsoever an easy or quick feat..In thinking about altering a body so it's not intact, I think it's done for the convenience or need of the perp. If a perp is going to leave a body (or body parts) out in the open where they can be discovered, he's not that concerned with someone IDing the remains. Anyone who's been on this planet during the last 20 years knows about DNA testing and that it can be done on any body part or tissue or even just bone.
No, this is about him. He took the extra step to dismember the remains, which is extra work and holds a risk of additional forensic evidence getting on him, or his vehicle, or his home/apartment. He'd want to obscure or get rid of evidence that might tie him to the murder. Also, as others have said, it's less conspicuous to be carrying a bag or maybe more than 1 bag, than trying to carry/conceal a person.
Ease of removal, ease of disposal, hide or obscure possible physical evidence that might link to him. I think that's what this may be about.
Above BBM for specific focus..Two days ago I was looking, for hours, at that picture of the scenario/location the killer choose to place/pose part of little Jessica's body, and what came to my mind was; the killer is some kind of artist...a photographer?, a painter? or at least some kind of artistic perverted aesthetic.
(ironicly the WY/Cody photgrapher suspect, JS, popped out of nowere few hours later, and I was really chocked, especially due to that he was such a brilliant artist, some of his photographs almost Ansel Adams quality, and also his coice of motives indeed resembled the Jessica dumping location, he would have been a perfect match to the suspect I had in mind, a brilliant artist, but even sicker)
The scenario/location is desolated, yes, it's kind of creepy, or maybe more melancolic, secretive, mystical and in it's it own way bear a strange kind of beauty, especially the way the two trees, one living, one dead, the hills in the background with the ruin cabin, the sky above it all, by nature it's alltogether kind of composed into an alluring artistic picture.
This is of course all WITHOUT little Jessica's remains in it.
But that is IMHO possibly why the killer choose that very spot, it was possibley in his sick mind the perfect scene/stage for him to present "his (sick) work", and it would at the same time increase chock effect.
I belive, as I have posted before, that he also choose this area because it was isolated enough for him to not beeing cought, while dumping/posing the remains, and at the same time a perfect spot in order for "his (sick) work" soon to be presented/ found.
The fact that he dumped Jessica's backpack in a location where it would be found shortly after he placed it, IMO again point to that he in NO way want to hide his deeds.
The fact that he dismembered Jessica's body IMO has NOTHING to do with trying to hide her identity, insted I belive it is part of his fantasy/ritual.
I also belive that the killer has provided some kind of messages to the police, and I belive there are horrible circumstances concerning the way Jessica was killed and desecrated that the police have, so far, kept serect.
The killer is IMHO, under the surface, a:
psychopathic/sadistic/artistic /complicated/sophisticated/manipulating/perverted/attention-seeking person, who have the ability to blend in as a pretty normal person, and I do belive he has killed before.
Al just my humble opinion of course.
You said that LE might have told the media to "back off" so the killer gets annoyed that he isn't getting attention, and he does a "look at me" move. We are talking about someone who has already murdered a little girl. There's a possibility that a "look at me" move could involve another child. Like, "Do I have to kill two kids for you to pay attention?"
Yeah, I believe you that you can't see the crime site from his house. I'm trying to figure out whether he did see something (like did he walk down the hill closer to the scene than he wants to admit?) or if he's just, as you say, having mixed memories, and if so how reliable what he said is.
Not that he seems to have seen much of anything of importance![]()
DNA could play pivotal role
http://www.9news.com/dontmiss/294560/630/DNA-will-play-pivotal-role-in-Ridgeway-case
Do you have a link, I haven't read that before
There is more than one suspect in the Arvada abduction/enticement attempts.
Sorry I missed where you said trophy. I walked away from computer for over an hour.
I'm not sure he's taunting yet either. But, if he's contacted them or left notes or done anything else to engage them I doubt we'll hear about it because this LE dept. doesn't seem like it's going to release a lot of info as of right now.
But if he is yup I bet he will use that.
Do you think he left the area? I go back and forth. Just curious.
There are many indicators that this was a very experienced sexual predator/serial killer, imo. The dismemberment of the body, imo, was to send a message; terrorize the community. The placement of the body, as well as the backpack was well thought out. Both were a little over a mile outside the 5 mile radius of the primary search area.
The abductor aware of forensics, search and rescue procedures, law enforcement SOPs, and strategies, etc., imo.
I have a question for locals. Why in the world do they not bulldoze those buildings down especially the mine opening?
First time poster, been lurking for some time, and have a point of clarification and a bit of information I have not seen yet in this thread.
1. It was suggested by Otto that some one might have driven around the loop of roads off of 82nd to hide their car, etc. This is not possible as there are gates at both entrances to these dirt roads.
2. No one has pointed out the fact that the backpack was found just a few 'feet' from the former home of a mother who suffocated her newborn... Stephanie Rochester.
This reporter seems to be the only one who has picked up on this detail (at the end of the article):
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_2...ca-ridgeway-moves-superior-backpack-discovery
This story was heartbreaking in the Boulder area and received some metro attention, but not much out side of the area. I cannot help but wonder if the backpack location is more than just coincidental....
Oh wow. This matches one of the locals WSers who said that two men 'approached' their daughter as she ran ahead, while the WSer was doing a survey. Who was that? Absentia? Wish I could remember but we've had so many locals join us!