MassGuy
The Monsters Aren’t The Ones Beneath The Bed
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Messages
- 25,690
- Reaction score
- 606,211
Not legally.Can one take out life insurance on someone without their knowledge?
Not legally.Can one take out life insurance on someone without their knowledge?
So you think it might KK or someone else dressed to look like Kelsey walking into the Safeway?
I definitely noticed that also yesterday.Yes, on all the other questions she answered she would say with certain knowledge that LE is following leads, on this question she said "I believe' LE continues to follows leads. We all know that she knows whether or not LE is looking for the body. Why say "I believe" ? It seems both in her body language and verbal language she distances herself from the body search question.
Welcome aboard @Esaj! You're among friends here. You'll find a list of more WS lingo, and other useful information at links below:In case anyone is wondering, I am pretty sure MOO = My Own Opinion (And is not a reference to PF’s cows as I believed for about 10 threads )
No. If there were any kinds of human remains (even human ashes) those would not be shipped to Colorado. They would remain in Idaho and a death investigation would commence under Idaho jurisdiction.I do wonder though is the “sensitive evidence” being transported from Idaho to CO might just be bone fragments or ashes. Forensics might tell the whole story if they do find fragments or blood anywhere and I think they did.
I think because the law was enacted to protect humans. Do you?
But, he went to a lot of trouble hiding her body so it wouldn't be found, or so it appears. That would prevent him from collecting quickly as she is only "missing", and that IS what he wanted everyone to believe.
I wonder if pf is the beneficiary and he had to act before she changed it
Not legally.
Early on, I wondered about this too. Another member who lives in the area posted she went to Safeway and there are a number of cameras within the store as well. My thoughts were, someone may have been there, watching out, and perhaps then followed her out, reported back to PF that she was on her way home. Maybe that individual followed her home as well? Not sure. Just thinking. MOOMOO. Yes. I think you hit on two reasons. MOO 1. What vehicle she was traveling in. 2. Who was watching. MOO
And to add, "KB was the member of the class for whose protection the aforementioned statutes were enacted"
Is it legalese, meaning that she was human, or something special, like illness/condition?
I don't believe you can anymore for just this reason- might tempt too many murderers.Can one take out life insurance on someone without their knowledge?
I am not a lawyer. My first assumption is, yes, the meaning is, what he did was horribly inhumane, and she was a human.
However, the wording also sounds like...as if...his duty was to protect her, and she was, in a way, vulnerable?
No body, no known way of death, no known location, no motive. Today, no known use of succinylcholine, either.
However, the case is so complicated and illogical, nothing would surprise me.
MOO
Dan May said they had nine weeks to decide whether or not to file as a DP. Can any of the verified attorneys weigh in on when that clock began/begins?
A probate case hasn't been opened. If there was a will then someone would be the Executor. Absent a will, under Colorado law Kelsey's daughter inherits everything. In a probate setting a Guardian Ad Litem would be appointed to represent the daughter's interests in the estate and a Trustee would ultimately be appointed to manage and protect the estate for the benefit of her daughter.The parents are likely the representatives of KB's estate, and their actions would include the interest of KB's minor child.