I know the conversation has moved on, but I didn't see these corrected and I always think it's best to get the details clear.
My point being was the charge is Murder 1 and the robbery is a method of explaining how it happened per LE. So far, the only person indicated to be involved in the solicitations per the R's all three were KK and now tampering is KK (I am not saying this is a great source but it is a source). If she is involved in all three solicitations and he is named in charge 1 that leaves charge 2. The of prosecution will drop one of these charges 1 or 2. The only report of what has been stolen or missing is her phone and purse with contents. Now, we do not have all the facts but if another person had committed a robbery resulting in a murder 1 charge, I think we would know. This leaves charge 2 being dropped and charge 1 being the primary.
I believe this is backward -- it was explained that the felony murder charge/theory is about a homicide that occurs during the commission of a robbery, not the other way around.
IIRC the neighbor left their own townhome sometime during that half hour timeframe, on the way out to their TG dinner celebration. Neighbor did not see PF's truck arrive or leave, only saw that it was there at the time they (neighbor) left their own home, which they estimated as being between 12:30 and 1pm.
I don't think we know which day any potential cleanup took place? No reason it had to be on the 25th.