MemPat
Without Art the Earth is just Eh!
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
- Messages
- 3,455
- Reaction score
- 47,938
Welcome to Websleuths, Sgt.I cant help thinking that a lot of theories on this thread are written without proof. PF hasn't commented yet? He did what most people should do when faced with a crime / allegations they have or haven't committed. He lawyered up.
What makes for good reading by the prosecution and press who might be at best misleading a possible fair and honest jury to assemble at trial does not prove his guilt now. I believe the prosecution have taken a massive gamble by cutting KK a deal. This could easily turn out to be a case KK's jealousy gone horrifically wrong & a cowboy framed by saddling up with a crazed ex lover who lies. The evidence could lead in that direction & none of can make any firm conclusions until the defendant speaks.
May I say it would require some flawed logic to assume no firm conclusions could be drawn without words from the defendant since we rarely hear them speak?
Also how would a DA get a case to move forward if he/she didn't set forward some facts?
Why would he go to so much trouble to provide "good reading" for the press?