dgfred
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2009
- Messages
- 4,560
- Reaction score
- 8,835
Why is that?I rather doubt that you could get a dead woman's hands to leave the kind of bruising that strangulation would produce.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why is that?I rather doubt that you could get a dead woman's hands to leave the kind of bruising that strangulation would produce.
Any jury will be influenced anyway if the defense wants to let the autopsy report out when they get it (my understanding) ... so might as well let it go. A jury will have to be well-vetted anyway with a husband accused of killing his entire family.
These are two separate incidents: CW left friends home to collect his dad at airport, and together they (CW & Dad) went to police for voluntary interview, and CW arrested later in the evening. The friends reportedly were so shaken by their overnight observance of CW that they contacted LE as soon as CW left their home. MOOSo, he stayed at the friends' house on Tuesday night, then went to the police voluntarily? At that point it was to report their having gone missing? Do we know anything about the impetus to go to the Police station? I did read somewhere that the same couple he stayed with also called the cops when he left.
You think? I would want it out there. Deadens the shock value at trial to the jurors if they are exposed to it ahead of time. MOOBut I doubt the defense wants the autopsy results out there either. JMO
What we know is what was in the arrest affidavit. He claims strangulation of all three. What we don't know is everything else, lol. moo
Unless it contains a bombshell that does not fit with his version of events.You think? I would want it out there. Deadens the shock value at trial to the jurors if they are exposed to it ahead of time. MOO
@ katy- Maybe... but usually anything the prosecution does not want, the defense does.
If I read it correctly, he was claiming strangulation of only two. The mother and one of the daughters. The other daughter was already blue and he did not see what had happened?
You think? I would want it out there. Deadens the shock value at trial to the jurors if they are exposed to it ahead of time. MOO
True.Unless it contains a bombshell that does not fit with his version of events.
Not as worried or distressed as what would 'normally'How did he act weird at the neighbor's house after the murders? Was he too calm, talking nonsense? What alerted the neighbors??
If you just came out of bankruptcy court and you are headed back to court a few years later for financial reasons on a debt that is less than $100 a month, you have financial problems. Bankruptcy has different levels. They still had to pay for their home. Bankruptcy does not change spending habits <and when your bankruptcy includes nothing but student loans and a bunch of retail debt, then you probably have issues managing money.> Student loans can not be dismissed in a bankruptcy. Also his mention to the Thayers about immediately putting his house up for sale is extremely odd unless he knows that he has to do it to save the equity. But for me...and modsnip if needed...the fact you are returning to court that quickly after a bankruptcy for HOA or any other issue tells me you are still financially stressed.
Not interested in any actions to find his family and talking about selling the house the day after they went 'missing'.Not as worried or distressed as what would 'normally'
be the loving father/husband.
The info that does come out, probably at the trial, will be stunning. I hope the trial is televised.I don't understand the prosecution wanting to not reveal the autopsy report. They have to give discovery to the Defense... then if something is bad for the prosecution they will be sure to let it out to the news.
Weird.