@Shekkiec
“Ok thanks ! I guess the moniter so far as evidence wouldn’t make me vote guilty or the interview. I need direct evidence so thank you for that link so i don’t misspeak“.
“I do not see the baby moniter as a prosecution benefit, I don’t see him lying on interview basis he killed the girls, I think if he didn’t call 911 perhaps he panicked but still not a reason to convict for me personally . I don’t believe him having an affair would make me vote guilty . I think physical evidence directly linking him to the death would matter. I think if I didn’t see someone kill you but I had fingerprints or weapon I would convict . Same here”
Are you saying that if his fingerprints and/or handprints and/or DNA are found on the necks of the babies, and none are from SW, you would still believe he’s innocent?
As far as the monitor goes, he said that Bella was blue and that he saw SW actively strangling Cece. If it’s proven in court that it was physically impossible to tell that Bella was blue, i.e. he lied, would you still believe he was innocent?
I’m just gobsmacked. Most criminal convictions are based on circumstantial evidence.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but my head is still reeling.
I would find fingerprints a reason to convict . I think where my miscommunication has caused problems is simply this.
The list of evidence we have right now as was given to me IMO would not make me vote guilty
Pommy was nice enough to explain the definition of evidence where I misspoke .
The fact that autoposy has not been released, the fact of no witness testimony to consider whether it is testimony of an expert or a friend we have yet to see anything to examine.
The list was given to me I’m paraphrasing
1. baby moniter / if the light was on in the room you can detect color hue change enough to cause me doubt on this fact alone
2. &3 the odds of two people unrelated doing the same crime same manner is unlikely .
*if I consider these charges separately and he confessed to strangling her I am not sure I can apply that method of strangling on one charge in my opinion towards the other charge that’s a legal question I would ask
4. Thru 6 He loved his children passionately did not try to call 911 which is irrational .
We don’t know if he tried CPR or what happened until testimony . Beyond a reasonable doubt not sure without further information from a criminal psychologist .
Didnt run into lawn screaming for help?could he have had Shame since death was accidental ?
Could he have fear no one would believe him? How does shock effect him bc he had no previous crime ? Our assumption on a normal reaction causes doubt to his but is that fact alone unsupported enough? No
7. No screams heard except dog barking that night. I have looked everywhere for time of dog to reference bc to me this is relevant and could be after the deaths. The sad part is this type of death does not make a lot of noise that can be heard from next door and the noise alone doesn’t determine the killer .
8. He didn’t wail before murdering her. If he did this as a reaction to SW murdering girls I can see it plausible anger (rage as he stated) was first emotion not grief.
9&10 the aftermath reaction from rage to control . I’m not again sure about this because what if he did panic afterwards and reacted based on realization of what had unfolded and a sense of shame isolation . Again without professional witness testimony , toxicology was he impaired , and a detailed explanation to consider I can’t base guilt standing alone as a statement without supporting evidence.
11&12the burial method psychology and placement . If he panicked and this was not planned then the only spot would be where he was familiar. This was oil field . We know the kids were not placed with mom. What if that was bc he wanted them away from her bc she did strangle them ? We do not have details of disposal yet. Those details would weigh my decision on this if evident . What if they were in bags or what if disposal was worse ? Guess what he did admit to this so again I need the distinction of how to legally separate my consideration bc this is a different charge.
13 he went to work and monitored his front door . My door app notifies me when someone comes as an alert . I would assume his does the same . No one wants an ap you need to moniter if you use it as security you want one that alerts you packages come or someone is entering your door . We know NU tried to enter bc she mentioned latch
14.one the interview CW stated he left voice texts. We do not know this is a fact yet to consider with a call log
15.&16 called friend and asked calmly what was going on . I would assume he would call because he was alerted to someone gaining entrance and he knew no one was there . I don’t recall the word calmly but I know he urged her to wait till he got there and said garage key code broken . Again this statement to me proves panic and guilt . But he has confessed to killing SW and disposing bodies. So imo this reaction would not prove the death of the girls solely bc I feel it would be the same reaction if only SW killed. He lied to friend and cops bc he had murdered SW and disposed of them . This alone could not make me say hey he killed girls too
17-2o interviews he had to do them it’s a no win , he was paranoid about interviews bc he asked neighbors how he seemed. Ok again she shows a guilty conscious bc he knew he was with holding truth .
So
The charges against the defendant are not evidence
*You must assume innocent until proven guilty
*You must not be influenced by SYMPATHY bias or prejudice reaching this decision
*If you find from the evidence of the prosecution that one or more elements has not been proven by prosecution you should find them not guilty
*the defendant is supposed to be judged by the crime of this case and no other
*each count should be considered separately not linked to previous charges
I want more information . The man has confessed to strangling his wife and disposing of his children . This is a complex case to me. We are all different and these reasons are enough for many I am not here to sway you or argue my opinion .
Welcome to Websleuths, 
