I think I was replying to the person you were replying to. IMO she would not murder her children upon hearing that he had a mistress, I think she knew before hand. She probably screamed to GTFO of the house and everything escalated.
Not when a crime has occurred.
My point was if it's weird CW is a child-killer with no history of domestic violence, it is just as weird to suggest SW is a child-killer with no history of domestic violence.
Thank you! This sums it up for me. I just couldn't get my point across.
I have thought the same thing ... if I was a lawyer and had a client like CW, I would definitely have my minions on this board throwing out BAIT ... great way to build a defense.
Bahahahaha, Cariis!
Thank you gitana1. This is the most logical statement I have read here in days. IMO, it will bear repeating many times over in the months (years) to come. WS is fortunate you are a member and are willing to participate in a thoughtful way.
Sometimes it's just a way to get a rise out of other posters, you see it all over the internet on message boards.
This is exactly what my husband and I think, which explains why there is some element of truth to his statement about the monitors and the precious angel being blue (gosh I hate typing that).
He already knew she was blue -- I doubt it was perfectly clear on the monitor.
However the scenario played out, we think SW went in to check on them & when she saw her babies lying there lifeless, she did what I have done in that situation...grab the child/person & shake her to get a reaction, which he was calmly viewing in the monitor and is SIMILAR to strangling so that image is fixed firmly in his mind as an explanation to what happened (sounds crazy when I think about it now but it was an automatic reaction...and obviously the child I was shaking had not been murdered, just choking on a small piece of candy).
Then he went in and strangled SW while she was distracted
All MOO of course
She knew her marriage was in trouble before that night. Several people have stated that. We can’t go by her Facebook accounts because those were written to present a “perfect” life appearance to boost her Thrive business. Did you notice that Christopher said he asked for a “separation,” not a “divorce?” Their marriage wasn’t nesessarily over. She left to go to North Carolina for 6 weeks just before. In my opinion, that’s a sign of a troubled marriage. I’ve never known anyone who left their husband for that long for a vacation. Especially a pregnant woman. She had a family back in N.C. who adored her. She could make a new start. I just don’t see her as that desperate. To me she seems much more independent and self reliant than you make her out to be.
Why wouldn't she kill him? I don't believe ANY woman would kill her children, then herself and let the cheater live so that he could happily go on with his life, with the other woman.
Maybe he thought being the owner of a huge house in a good suburb was a real babe magnet. That may have been the way his mistress reacted if she thought (as men often say) that he was getting a divorce, etc. (Yes I know about the financial problems, but maybe the mistress made a lot of $$$$, being a professional, and maybe he was fooling himself into thinking "they" would make it OK)..
But, more than likely will NEVER be with again ...I hope he got enough “enjoyment” to last a lifetime.
