I read new Judge has been selected, I haven’t had a chance to read up on Judge RL yet but plan to later. Really, no matter which Judge presides over BM’s trial at whichever venue (I do believe it will stay in Chaffee County), one thing remains the same-
E & N are still stuck with their client defending imo, the indefensible.
IMO, BM will receive a fair trial and since he retained
E & N shortly after his arrest, considering all his interactions/meetings with them, their representation at proceedings that have already taken place- PH’s, bond hearing, ankle monitor issue hearing, etc., any and all meetings, court filings and proceedings from here on out up to and including trial, E & N will continue getting richer while ‘ole BMoneybags is drained down to BMoneyless aka, BM will be broke after everything’s said and done i.e., by the time the trial’s over and he’s convicted, which hopefully will be sometime this year.
Morphew convicted in ‘22, definitely has a nice ring to it.
My apologies in advance for the long post, I’ve literally been working on it since I logged off work at 3pm and on my phone which is why it took so long to compose lol. I am not able to cite exact times or quote BM exactly in bullet points below because I didn’t have the AA in front of me, so paraphrased from being burned in my memory after reading the AA many, many times.
Here’s some of what the future jury will be hearing and considering from the prosecution:
the fact that a mere few days after Suzanne sent BM message stating “I’m done, let’s do this civilly”, BM places himself at home alone with Suzanne running around their home/property, gun in hand, shortly after which Suzanne goes completely dark never to be heard from or seen EVER again. For a woman who was normally very active on her phone and other social media apps communicating and keeping in touch frequently with those she loved most in the world is powerful and points to a normally active/communicative SM not being able to communicate with or respond to those she loved after BM arrived home to this very day because she wasn’t alive for very long after BM arrived home on the afternoon of Saturday, May 9th, 2020. This speak volumes. And when you consider and add to all of those things the powerful digital evidence on BM’s phone, his phone’s movements, and what his truck telematics activity shows late Saturday night and in wee hours of Sunday morning, all considered, is absolutely damning evidence against the defendant.
If I’m a juror that evidence alone most definitely carries a lot of weight, and while I’m listening, thinking about and weighing those things, I’d also be thinking that if he were innocent then there is no reason whatsoever for BM to lie about ANYTHING. Then I consider the evidence which shows he lied and lied ALOT:
- said he was sound asleep next to Suzanne all night from approx 9pm until his alarm woke him up at 4:30am Sunday. LIE. Digital evidence of his truck telematics shows doors opening and closing later that night and in the wee early morning hours of Sunday- in 9-10pm hour, truck door activity and truck is backed up 95 feet. Later, in the 3/4:00am hour there’s more truck door activity and BM phone moves to staged bike area;
- said he left a sleeping, lightly snoring Suzanne at 5:00am and drove straight to hotel in Broomfield. LIE. Digital evidence shows he turned left when he should have turned right to head straight to Broomfield, and when LE confronted him about the detour he took which happens to be same area staged helmet was found, suddenly remembered aka lied/changed his story, and admitted to turning left instead of right to go find/chase bull elk;
- said after he made the left turn detour to chase Bull Elk, turned around and drove straight to hotel in Broomfield. LIE. Digital evidence shows he made a few stops on his way to hotel at different locations to dump trash to include the dumping of tranquilizer materials (imo he dumped other incriminating evidence too);
- said he worked all day in Broomfield. LIE. Digital evidence shows he worked a grand total of 11-15 minutes at jobsite;
- said he was at the jobsite when he got the family emergency call. LIE. Digital evidence shows he was at the hotel when he got the emergency call, in fact digital evidence showed he had been in that hotel room for better part of day 5-5.5 hours straight when he claimed to be working (imo spent that time showering/washing evidence off himself, took a nap due to being up all night, waiting to receive the emergency call).
There’s too many other BM lies and inconsistencies to list here that the evidence shows otherwise and shows how his own words betray him at every turn. We see it all throughout the AA, BM lies/inconsistent statements and changing story each time he’s presented with new piece of evidence. Alibi? Yeah, he doesn’t have one and the jury will come to that conclusion as well. Again, if I’m a juror I know that an innocent person that doesn’t have anything to hide or lie about, hides or lies about nothing. Additionally, there are just too many other oddities and things BM either did or didn’t do that would have to be considered ‘coincidences’ to believe BM innocent, too many to list here that have been discussed in these threads and which I’m sure prosecution will also bring up at trial if admissible. And with direct witness testimony of SO, JL, HW, MG, JR, et al including and not least of which the testimony of the great SA Grusing, can’t wait to see him do what he does best on the stand, BM is toast.
IMO, the jury will be able to see through all the tricks, smoke and mirrors E & N try to throw up at trial too. They literally have nothing else but to try and attack the state and investigation of all LE involved.
I expect some victim blaming from team BM at trial as well. Yes, they have and will go that low. IMO, jurors don’t like when victim is put on trial so any victim blaming of Suzanne imo will not go over well with the jury and work against team BM. And that nothingburger random touch DNA on SM vehicle glovebox that could’ve been deposited there at anytime by anyone who either worked on her vehicle, was a passenger in her vehicle etc, etc, will be explained thoroughly by expert witness, and explained that it does not exculpate BM.
IMO, as long as the prosecution presents their case in a methodical, thorough, well executed manner, explain every detail and witness testimony in a most concise, comprehensive way for the jury to understand and be able to connect the dots of the ‘mountains’ of circumstantial evidence, and explain to jury that it is the totality thereof that leads to only one logical conclusion, that BM is guilty of murdering his wife, and tampering with her deceased body to cover up his heinous, nefarious acts.
IMO, after both sides rest after presenting closing arguments, the jury will deliberate and come to unanimous decision/verdict-BM guilty BARD, convicted on all charges and sent to prison for the rest of his miserable life.
Hang on dear Suzanne, justice is coming.
All of the above IMHOO
#FindSuzanne
#BringSuzanneHome
#JusticeForSuzanne
eta-clarity
