From the above post BBM. “..and since the allegation was denied by the ex-wife after all. “
Just speculating but basing my thoughts on past experiences
If I am on the other side of a marriage/divorce from a man who was at one time abusive in some fashion to me during our marriage, what possible benefit is it to me to come forward and make that abuse public at this point? I would deny it too even if it were true.
Perhaps I have alimony and child support being paid to me by my ex. Do I want him to lose his job, or to become known as an abuser? Surely this would effect his standing in the community
and hinder his ability to attract clients
thereby limiting his income potential.
Do I want my child’s friends in school to whisper about her father having been an
“Abuser”.
Do I really want to open up what is a closed book between my ex and I and possibly put myself and my child in a dangerous position by pushing the wrong buttons and angering him ?
I see only downside at this point for the ex were she to open up about any abuse in her former marriage ( if any indeed existed).
She is on the other side of that situation and it does her no good to go back in time, open old wounds and engage with a man she no longer wants to engage with.
One other point I have mentioned before that I continue to find curious. Llama, as he tells it, did not find out about the investigator interviewing his wife from his wife. Now why wouldn’t the ex-wife have phoned Ramsey, if there never had been any abuse and said I had a visit today, Geewiz, what’s up with this?
Per Llama, he was called by the Canon City Sheriff and told a DA was investigating him. So LE calling a judge to tell him a DA was investigating him.
Just my thoughts IMO
