From the time Kelsey Berreth went missing to the end of the trial we kept being shocked by each new revelation over and over and over again. Our conjectures based on MSM coverage paled compared to what the AA revealed. And the info in the AA was just the tip of the iceberg compared to the evidence presented at trial. And it was the prosecution’s telling of that story that made the horror tangible.
I think it will go down that way again in this case. The AA will give us enough discrete information to justify the arrest — web search histories, IM’s, phone pings, key physical forensic evidence gathered, perhaps even a few revealing 3rd party interviews. (I am still not convinced there isn’t a KK equivalent here, or at least a “KK-lite” — someone, male or female, with enough inside info to fill in important gaps.) But the AA won’t reveal everything. Not even close. It will sketch key parts of the story but it won’t draw the entire panorama, it won’t ink in all the little details, it won’t colorize it. But they’ll do that at the trial. Count on it.
It won’t be until 100% of discovery is made available to the defense that they will finally realize just how cooked his goose actually is. Only then might we see a decision to cooperate in exchange for reduced charges. IF BM has better counsel than PF and IF he’s wise enough to see the situation for what it is. But somehow I doubt he will...
MOO.
I absolutely agree. He will proclaim his innocence until the bitter end. It would be super fantastic if the state has so much evidence, that they choose not to even offer a plea deal (with the exception of revealing where SM can be found. I personally don't think he will. It would be an admittance of guilt). I think the ultimate punishment for BM would be having all of his dirty little secrets exposed for the world to see.